GOOD MORNING. WE LIKE TO CALL
THE ORDER. THE APPROPRIATIONS
COMMITTEE MEETING FOR MAY 17TH.
WE HAVE BEFORE US 118 BILLS TO
CONSIDER THIS MORNING AS A PART
OF OUR REGULAR ORDERED HEARING.
BEFORE WE BEGIN. I'D LIKE TO
JUST GO OVER A FEW ROLES AS WE
ALWAYS DO, OR HOW WE OPERATE AND
GREAT ORDER IN THIS COMMITTEE.
FIRST I'D LIKE TO THINK
ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S ORTEGA FOR
FILLING IN FOR MEMBER WILSON
TODAY. I WOULD ALSO NOTE THAT
THE COMMITTEE WILL BE PULLING A
B 17 05 MAKIN HER FROM FROM THE
FILE TODAY. I'D ALSO LIKE TO
JUST MAKE A QUICK STATEMENT AS
REGARDS TO ASSEMBLY BILL 5 38.
OF THE REGIONALIZATION BILL.
INTERACTIONS WITH MY COLLEAGUES
AND STAKEHOLDERS THROUGHOUT THE
WEST. PERSUADE ME THAT THERE IS
STRONG AND WIDESPREAD INTEREST
AND WORKING TOGETHER ON THE
DETAILS OF GOVERNANCE AND
OPERATIONS OF THE WESTERN
REGIONAL TRANSMISSION
ORGANIZATION. I'M PUTTING A B 35
38 ON HOLD FOR NOW TO ALLOW THAT
TO HAPPEN. I'M HOPEFUL OF RAPID
PROGRESS, OPENING THE WAY FOR
LEGISLATIVE ACTION AT THE
EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE. BACK TO
OUR RULES FOR OPERATION IN THIS
MEETING. WE ENCOURAGE THE PUBLIC
TO PROVIDE WRITTEN TESTIMONY
BEFORE THE HEARING BY VISITING
THE COMMITTEE WEBSITE AT A PRO
DOT ASSEMBLY DOT CA.GOV. PLEASE
NOTE THAT ANY WRITTEN TESTIMONY
SUBMITTED TO THE COMMITTEE IS
CONSIDERED PUBLIC COMMENT AND
MAYBE READ INTO THE RECORD OR
REPRINTED. THE HEARING ROOM IS
OPEN FOR ATTENDANCE. ALL ARE
ENCOURAGED TO WATCH THE HEARING
FROM ITS LIVESTREAM ON THE
ASSEMBLY WEBSITE ASSEMBLY DOT
CA.GOV BACKSLASH TODAY'S EVENTS
. WE ENCOURAGE THE PUBLIC TO
MONITOR THE COMMITTEE WEBSITE
FOR UPDATES. WE WILL ACCEPT
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ANY BILL
PLACED ON THE SUSPENSE FILE BY
THE COMMITTEE TODAY, FOR WHICH
THE AUTHOR WEIGHED PRESENTATION
BEFORE THE CLOSE OF THE REGULAR
ORDERED HEARING. TESTIMONY ON
ANY SUCH BILL WILL BE LIMITED TO
A STATEMENT OF NAME ORGANIZATION
. IF ANY IMPOSITION ON THE BILL
, THE COMMITTEE WILL ALLOW NO
MORE THAN 40 MINUTES OF
TESTIMONY IN TOTAL. AS YOU CAME
INTO THE HEARING ROOM TODAY, THE
SERGEANT'S DIRECTED YOUR
ATTENTION TO THE RULES OF PUBLIC
FOR PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AND
PARTICIPATION, WHICH WERE POSTED
OUTSIDE THE DOOR. I ENCOURAGE
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE IN
ATTENDANCE TO BE AWARE OF AND
OBSERVE THOSE RULES. PLEASE BE
AWARE THAT VIOLATIONS OF THESE
RULES OR OTHER VIOLATIONS OF
GENERAL COURTESY OF DECORUM MAY
SUBJECT YOU TO REMOVAL OR OTHER
ENFORCEMENT PROCESSES. NOW I
WILL LOOK TO SEE IF WE HAVE A
QUORUM. I'M NOT SURE SO WHAT
WE'LL DO IS WE'LL MOVE TO THOSE
BILLS TO BE PRESENTED TO US
TODAY. THE FIRST BILL BEFORE US
WILL BE IRREGULAR CURRY A B 659
. AND THAT AS I DO PASS WELCOME.
GOOD MORNING, MR CHAIR AND
MEMBERS. THANK YOU FOR THE DO
PASS RECOMMENDATION THE
OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT ON THE
FISCAL IMPACTS OF A B 659.
BECAUSE THIS COMMITTEE ONLY
DEALS WITH THOSE IMPACTS. I WILL
KEEP THIS SHORT. I'VE BEEN
WORKING ON BRINGING THIS
PROPOSAL FORWARD FOR FIVE YEARS
DURING THAT TIME OVER 203,000.
AMERICANS HAVE DEVELOPED CANCER
AND MORE THAN 35,000 PEOPLE HAVE
DIED FROM HPV RELATED CANCERS.
BUT I KNOW IT. THIS IS NOT THE
COMMITTEE COMMITTEES JOB TO
CALCULATE HUMAN COSTS. BECAUSE
WE HAVE REMOVED THE ENFORCEMENT
MECHANISMS FROM THE BILL AT ALL
LEVELS OF EDUCATION AND THE
PARENTAL NOTIFICATION ON THE
BACK SCENE WILL BE DONE AS PART
OF THE EXISTING NOTIFICATIONS
FROM SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN THE
STATISTICALLY PREVALENT
LANGUAGES OF THE SCHOOL'S
POPULATION. THE STATE COSTS OF
COMPLIANCE ARE ESTIMATED AT
20,000 PER YEAR. I BELIEVE THIS
COST WILL BE, UM, COST TO BE
WELL JUSTIFIED BY THE TENS OF
THOUSANDS OF LIVES WILL BE SAVED
BY THIS NEW LAW HERE WITH ME TO
SPEAK IN SUPPORT IS, UH, MOLLY
RUBS ROBSON AND VICE PRESIDENT
OF GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS FOR
PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF
CALIFORNIA, AND TAYLOR JACKSON,
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT
AFFAIRS AT CALIFORNIA HEALTH.
LET'S ADVOCATES THANK YOU. I
BELIEVE WE HAVE A QUORUM, SO
WE'LL CALL THE ROLE TO ESTABLISH
AQUARIUM. HOLDEN. DOLLY BRIAN.
CALDERON HERE, WENDY CARILLO
DIXON. PHªN HOT. LOWENTHAL
MATHIS HAPPEN. HALLOWEEN.
ROBERT RIVAS SANCHEZ.
REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHED. I'LL
TELL YOU HERE. FORM IS
ESTABLISHED, WILL HEAR NOW FROM
YOUR WITNESS. THANK YOU. GOOD
MORNING, MOLLY ROBSON WITH
PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES OF
CALIFORNIA WE REPRESENT THE
SEVEN AFFILIATES IN THE STATE
WILL PROVIDE SEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE
HEALTH CARE TO OVER 1.8 MILLION
PATIENT VISITS EVERY YEAR.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS PROUD TO
SUPPORT 86 59 TO IMPROVE UPTAKE
OF THE HPV VACCINE AMONG YOUNG
PEOPLE. 86 59 WOULD REQUIRE
COVERAGE OF THE HPV VACCINE IN
FAMILY PACKED FOR PEOPLE UNDER
18. CLOSING A GAP IN COVERAGE
THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS AS THE
LARGEST FAMILY PACK PROVIDER IN
THE STATE. PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS
EAGER TO SEE THIS COVERAGE
POSSIBLE WITH OUR HEALTH CENTERS
CAN PROVIDE THIS VACCINE TO
PATIENTS WHEN THEY'RE ALREADY
SEEKING SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE
HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN OUR
HEALTH CENTERS. AS THE ANALYSIS
NOTES, THE COSTS ON STATE ARE
RELATIVELY MINOR, AND THIS BILL
WILL IMPROVE ACCESS TO LIFE
SAVING CARE. SO I RESPECTFULLY
URGE YOUR SUPPORT TODAY. THANK
YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE
FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE
TO COMMENT ON THIS BILL EITHER
IN FAVOR OR OPPOSED? OH, I'M
SORRY. I'M SORRY. MY WE DO HAVE
ONE MORE WITNESS, PLEASE. THANK
YOU, MR CHAIR. GOOD MORNING
MEMBERS. TAYLOR JACKSON WITH
CALIFORNIA HEALTH PLUS ADVOCATES
. WE REPRESENT CALIFORNIA'S
ALMOST 1300 COMMUNITY CLINICS,
FREE CLINICS, RURAL HEALTH
CENTERS AND FEDERALLY QUALIFIED
HEALTH CENTERS. WE ARE IN STRONG
SUPPORT OF A B +659 AND I WILL
NOTE THE FISCAL TAG OF 20,000
FOR NOTIFYING FAMILIES IS
RELATIVELY SMALL WHEN YOU
CONSIDER THE LIVES THAT COULD BE
SAVED IF THE BILL IS
IMPLEMENTED, AND IN ADDITION THE
LONG TERM SAVINGS TO THE HEALTH
CARE SYSTEM FOR LESS FOLKS,
ULTIMATELY REQUIRING ANSWER.
TREATMENT SHOULD ALSO BE
CONSIDERED. SO WE RESPECTFULLY
ASK FOR YOUR I VOTE TODAY. THANK
YOU. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
PRESENTATIONS THAT'S BEEN MOVED
BY MEMBER PATHAN. THE SECOND IS
IN ORDER. THEY CAN BRING MR
HART. OKAY, WE'LL HEAR FROM THE
PUBLIC. THOSE ARE MR CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS RAND MARTIN ON BEHALF OF
THE AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION,
WHICH IN ADDITION TO BEING THE
LARGEST PROVIDER OF HIV CARE IS
ALSO A MAJOR PROVIDER OF STD
PREVENTION, CARE AND TREATMENT
ACROSS THE STATE. VERY STRONG
SUPPORT FOR THIS BILL. THANK
YOU. OLIVIA MICHAEL'S CO
FOUNDER, VISAS FOR VACCINE WE
OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED FURTHER.
JOSHUA COLEMAN, UH, RESIDENT OF
ROOSEVELT, CALIFORNIA, CO
FOUNDER OF THE VACCINE AND ALSO
OPPOSED THE BILL UNLESS FURTHER
AMENDED TO INCLUDE CLEAR
LANGUAGE THAT THIS IS NOT A
MANDATE. GOOD MORNING. RYAN
SOUZA REPRESENTS REPRESENTING
ESSENTIAL ACCESS, HELP AND
SUPPORT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO
SPEAK? HI THANK YOU FOR YOUR
TIME. MY NAME IS SARAH LONG. I'M
A NURSE PRACTITIONER AND RN OUT
OF OAKLAND AND RICHMOND. I AM
JUST ASKING THAT YOU CONSIDER
THE WORDING EXPECTED. I SERVED
MINORITIES AND THE UNDERSERVED
AND I'M VERY CONCERNED ABOUT A
LANGUAGE BARRIER. AND I JUST ASK
THAT YOU CONSIDER THAT MANY OF
MY PATIENTS HAVE ACES THEY HAVE
ADVERSE UM, CHILDHOOD. EVENTS
THAT HAPPENS AND, UM I'M JUST
ASKING THAT YOU CHANGED THE
WORDING, PLEASE AND MAKE IT
CLEAR SO THERE'S NO LANGUAGE
BARRIERS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
THANK YOU. I SEE. NO OTHER
MEMBER FROM THE PUBLIC THEY
WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT WILL BRING
IT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE. ARE
THERE ANY QUESTIONS? COMMENTS.
WE DO HAVE EMOTION. WOULD YOU
LIKE TO CLOSE? I WOULD LIKE TO
CLOSE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR
YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION
MEMBERS $20,000 PER YEAR TO
PREVENT 37,000 NEW CANCER
PATIENTS. I RESPECTFULLY ASK
HER, I WROTE THANK YOU. THE
BILLS ARE GOING TO BE ROLL CALL
WEBER, NOT VOTING. THANK YOU. IT
WAS OVER.
YOU'RE PRESENTING ON 11 76. AND
THAT DOES HAVE A DO PASS. THANK
YOU, MR CHAIR MEMBERS. MEMBERS
OF THE STAFF. THANK YOU FOR
ALLOWING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO
PRESENT A B 11 76 AND THANK YOU
FOR THE Dð PAST RECOMMENDATION.
THIS BILL IS SPONSORED BY
CLIMATE PLAN CALIFORNIA AND
SUPPORTED BY A WIDE RANGE OF
GROUPS INVESTED IN THE
ENVIRONMENT AND A CLEAN ENERGY
FUTURE. A B 11 76 ENCOURAGES
HIGH LEVEL PLANNING AND
STRATEGIES AT THE LOCAL LEVEL TO
MEET THE ELECTRIFICATION NEEDS
OF OUR COMMUNITIES, RESIDENTS,
VISITORS, EMPLOYEES AND
BUSINESSES. CALIFORNIA HAS
ADOPTED AMBITIOUS CLIMATE GOALS
THAT REQUIRE DRASTIC CUTS IN
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM
OUR TRANSPORTATION AND BUILDING
SECTORS TO MEET THESE GOALS, WE
WILL NEED OVER 1 MILLION
ELECTRIC CHARGES TO SUPPORT 8
MILLION ELECTRIC VEHICLES
ANTICIPATED. ON THE ROAD BY 2030
EVEN MORE TO MEET THE STATE'S
2035 ELECTRIC VEHICLE MANDATE.
ENSURING THAT E V CHARGING AND
BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION ARE
AVAILABLE TO EVERYONE, INCLUDING
LOWER INCOME COMMUNITIES,
RENTERS AND PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN
MULTI FAMILY HOUSING IS CRUCIAL
AND ESTABLISHING THE NECESSARY
CHARGING AND TRANSMISSION
INFRASTRUCTURE TO INFRASTRUCTURE
TO SUPPORT VEHICLE FLEETS AND
SMALL BUSINESSES REQUIRES ON THE
GROUND KNOWLEDGE OF OUR LOCAL
COMMUNITIES. LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
ARE CRUCIAL PARTNERS IN MEETING
OUR CLIMATE GOALS BECAUSE THEY
KNOW THE NEEDS OF THEIR
COMMUNITIES BEST AND BECAUSE
LOCAL PLANNING IS NEEDED TO
ASSURE THAT EVERYONE AT ALL
INCOME LEVELS AND IN ALL ZIP
CODES AND CHARGE THEIR CARS AND
AFFORD TO POWER THEIR HOMES WITH
CLEAN ENERGY. AS THE ANALYSIS
STATES. THE BILL INCURS NO COST
TO THE STATE. WE'VE AGREED TO
TAKE AMENDMENTS THAT ARE NOT YET
IN PRINT, WHICH WILL GIVE MORE
FLEXIBILITY TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
TO COMPLY WITH THE BILL AND
REDUCE THEIR COSTS, INCLUDING
OPTIONS OUTSIDE THE GENERAL PLAN
PROCESS. WE'RE CONTINUING TO
WORK WITH THE AMERICAN PLANNING
ASSOCIATION, THE LEAGUE OF
CITIES, THE REAL COUNTY
REPRESENTATIVE, CALIFORNIA AND
THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION ON ADDITIONAL
AMENDMENTS THAT WILL INCORPORATE
THEIR FEEDBACK. WITH ME. TODAY
IS SPOTTY. FATIMA IQBAL ZOO BAR
OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
VOTERS TO PROVIDE SOME
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. BEAR
WITH CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
VOTERS AND WE PROBABLY SUPPORT
11 76 ALONGSIDE THE CLIMATE
CENTER CLIMATE PLAN. CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENT CALIFORNIA SIERRA
CLUB BBW LOCAL UNION, 569 AND
MANY OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL VOTERS
REPRESENTS OVER 110,000 MEMBERS
WITH A MISSION TO PROTECT AND
ENHANCE THE ENVIRONMENT AND
HEALTH OF ALL CALIFORNIA
COMMUNITIES. BY ADVANCING
CRITICAL POLICY THAT WILL HELP
US EQUITABLY REACH OUR STATE
ZERO EMISSIONS GOALS. PERSONALLY
I STEM FROM AN AREA OF THE STATE
THAT HAS HISTORICALLY BEEN
SUSCEPTIBLE TO ENVIRONMENTAL
RACISM AND RECORD RATES OF
POLLUTION FROM MULTIPLE SECTORS
. THE URGENCY TO MOVE TOWARDS
CLEAN ENERGY TO PROTECT
COMMUNITIES LIKE MINE ACROSS THE
STATE COULDN'T BE GREATER. WHILE
THIS BILL ALREADY HAS ZERO COST
TO THE STATE, I APPLAUD THE
AUTHOR IN HIS OFFICE AND WORKING
WITH ALL STAKEHOLDERS TO MAKE IT
MORE FLEXIBLE FOR LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS TO MEET THE
PROVISIONS OF THE BILL,
INCLUDING LOWER IMPLEMENTATION
COSTS AND OPTIONS OUTSIDE OF THE
GENERAL PLAN PROCESS. THANK YOU
AND I RESPECTFULLY URGE THE
CHAIRS AND MEMBERS I VOTE OF A B
11 76. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR
YOUR PRESENTATION MEMBERS OF THE
PUBLIC THEY WOULD LIKE TO
COMMENT ON 11 76. SEE NOW WE'LL
COME BACK TO THE COMMITTEE. ANY
COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? OH, COME
ON. SWIMBAIT, RUSSIA, YODER,
ANDREW SMELLS AND LANGHAM, HALF
THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
CURRENT OPPOSITION. THANK YOU.
YOU KNOW, OTHER THAN THE PUBLIC
IS THERE A MOTION? HAPPEN. DO
YOU LIKE TO CLOSE? THANK YOU
MEMBERS AND CHAIR. I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR VOTE.
THANK YOU. THE BILL IS OUT ON
THE B ROLL CALL. WARNER.
PRESENTING A B 73. AS THEY DO
PASS.
GOOD MORNING, MR CHAIRMAN
MEMBERS. THANK YOU FOR THE
RECOMMENDATION, 73 WOULD MAKE
INTERSECTIONS FOR BICYCLISTS,
DRIVERS AND PEDESTRIANS. UH
SAFER BY ALLOWING BICYCLES TO
TREAT STOP SIGNS AS YIELD SIGNS
WHEN APPROACHING AN INTERSECTION
. SPECIFICALLY THE BILL WILL
INDIVIDUALS 18 YEARS OF AGE AND
OLDER TO YIELD WHEN APPROACHING
A STOP SIGN AT AN INTERSECTION,
MAKING A SIX YEAR PILOT PROGRAM.
LIMIT THE STOPPERS YIELD TO TWO
LANE ROADS AT STOP SIGN
CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS AT THAT
MINERS WHO FAILED TO STOP AT A
STOP SIGN. WE'LL GET A WARNING
TICKET FOR THE FIRST OFFENSE.
AND REQUIRE CHP TO COLLECT AND
EVALUATE DATA FROM THE PILOT AND
SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE
LEGISLATURE ON THE EFFECTS OF
THIS CHANGE IN LAW. FOR PURPOSES
OF THIS COMMITTEE, THE COST
ESTIMATE FOR CHP TO COLLECT AND
EVALUATE THE DATA AND PREPARE
THE REPORT OR MINOR AND
OBSERVABLE I RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR MY VOTE AND INTEREST OF TIME
. I HAVE NO WITNESSES WITH ME
TODAY. WE APPRECIATE THAT.
ANYONE FROM THE FROM THE PUBLIC.
THEY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE
BILL. SAYING NONE. WE'LL BRING
IT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE. AND
MOVED BY SOMETHING HER HEART.
CALDERON. THERE'S A SECOND. THE
BILL IS OUT ON THE BUREAU CALL.
THANK YOU. THE MEMBER SZABO.
MAYBE 9 11. Dð PASS AS AMENDED.
GOOD MORNING. EXCUSE ME, MR
CHAIR AND MEMBERS. UM 89 11 IS A
CLEANUP MEASURE TO ABC. 7 21 BY
BLOOM AND 2021 AND PROVIDES
CONFIDENCE TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
DEVELOPERS WHO WANT TO PURCHASE
REAL ESTATE FOR 100% AFFORDABLE
HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS. I'M HAPPY
TO ACCEPT THE COMMITTEE'S
AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE 89 11 DOES
NOT CREATE UNNECESSARY FINANCIAL
BURDENS FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
IN THE INTEREST OF TIME. I DON'T
HAVE WITNESSES, BUT WANTED TO
MENTION THAT THIS IS SPONSORED
BY SPUR AND SUPPORTED BY
ORGANIZATIONS, BRINGING, UM, WHO
ARE COMMITTED TO BRINGING MUCH
NEEDED AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING
ONLINE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. ON
A B 9 11. BEEN MOVED BY CALDERON
SECOND BY HEART. BILL IS OUT ON
THE B ROLL CALL. THANK YOU.
CARILLO. PRESENTING A B 965. THE
DO PASS. GOOD MORNING, MR CHURCH
AND MEMBERS. THANK YOU FOR
ALLOWING ME 2% ASSEMBLY BILL
965. MAYBE 9656 TO HELP
BROADBAND PERMITS GET PROCESSED
MORE EFFICIENTLY, SO OUR
CONSTITUENTS CAN MORE QUICKLY
BENEFIT FROM HIGH SPEED
INTERNET. WHEN THE BROOKLYN
PROJECT HAS BEEN DEPLOYED IN A
COMMUNITY OFTEN TIMES THERE ARE
NUMEROUS LOCATIONS WERE
IDENTICAL TELECOMMUNICATION
INFRASTRUCTURE HAS BEEN
INSTALLED TO PROVIDE HIGH SPEED
INTERNET THEY ARE VERY SIMPLE
AND VERY SIMILAR. THIS BILL
ENSURES THAT GROUPS OF NEARLY
IDENTICAL BROADBAND PERMITS CAN
BE PROCESSED TOGETHER IN A
BATCH. MODERN THIS BILL, BECAUSE
I KNOW FIRSTHAND HOW THIS
PERMITS WORK. I USED TO PROCESS
THESE AS A PLANNER FOR OVER 20
YEARS. I WORK IN THE SERIES OF
COACHELLA, THIS ROCK SPRINGS IN
THE CITY OF PALMDALE. IF THIS
BILL WAS IN PLACE AT THE TIME,
WHEN I WAS A PLANNER, IT WOULD
HAVE DECREASED MY WORKLOAD IN
HAVING TO APPROVE EVERY SINGLE
PREMIER ONE BY ONE. AND WOULD
HAVE ALLOWED ME TO USE MY TIME
IN OTHER AREAS OF NEED, SUCH AS
IN HOUSING ENTITLEMENTS. EVERY
965 ALSO STRIKE THE RIGHT
BALANCE BETWEEN EFFICIENCY AND
STATE WHAT BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
AND LOCAL CONTROL? AND I WANT TO
BE CLEAR THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
WILL STILL MAINTAIN FULL
CONTROL. PERMIT FEES WILL STILL
BASIC RECEIVED BY LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS, BUT STAFF CAN MORE
EASILY PROCESS 13 HIGH BALLING
BROADBAND PERMITS AS A GROUP
INSTEAD OF INDIVIDUALLY. GIVEN
THE PUBLIC INCREASED RELIANCE ON
HIGH SPEED INTERNET ACCESS AND
THE IMPORTANCE OF BROADBAND FOR
PUBLIC SAFETY, PUBLIC HEALTH,
ECONOMIC GROWTH, EDUCATION
CREATION, HOUSING, AFFORDABILITY
AND EMISSION REDUCTIONS. IT IS
IN CALIFORNIA'S BEST INTEREST
FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROBLEM
PROJECT PROMISED TO BE PROCESSED
AS QUICKLY AND EFFICIENTLY AS
POSSIBLE WHILE AGAIN MAINTAINING
LOCAL CONTROL. YOU WANT ME TO
TESTIFY IN SUPPORT AND ANSWERING
THE QUESTIONS IS DONE. ADVISOR
THERE ACROSS GENERAL AFFAIRS FOR
CROWN CASTLE. THANK YOU. THANK
YOU. THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING,
CHAIR AND MEMBERS. MY NAME IS
DAN SCHWEITZER. I'M THE DIRECTOR
OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS FOR CROWN
CASTLE, THE NATION'S LARGEST
SHARED TELECOMMUNICATIONS
INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER,
BUILDING, OPERATING AND
MAINTAINING BROADBAND FOR A
VARIETY OF CUSTOMERS, INCLUDING
K THROUGH 12 SCHOOL DISTRICTS,
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, UNIVERSITIES,
I SPS AND CELL PHONE CARRIERS.
CROWN CASTLE WORKS WITH LOCAL
JURISDICTIONS EVERY DAY IN THIS
STATE AND ACROSS THE COUNTRY TO
DEPLOY BROADBAND. MAYBE 9 65
REFLECTS THE BEST PRACTICE OF
PERMIT MATCHING THE BILL SIMPLY
REQUIRES LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO
MAKE A DECISION AND THIS IS A
KEY POINT OF THE BILL DOES NOT
REQUIRE LOCAL JURISDICTIONS TO
APPROVE BUT RATHER TO ACT ON THE
APPLICATION. IT DOESN'T REQUIRE
THEM TO APPROVE THE PERMITS, AS
I INDICATED, BUT JUST TO ACT ON
THE APPLICATION, MAYBE 9 65 IS
NEEDED BECAUSE EVEN THOUGH SOME
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE USING
PERMIT MATCHING FOR BROADBAND
PROJECTS, MANY ARE NOT. PERMIT
APPROVALS MAKE THE DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN COMMUNITIES GETTING
CONNECTED TO HIGH SPEED INTERNET
IN 2 TO 3 MONTHS VERSUS MULTIPLE
MONTHS OR EVEN OVER A YEAR. MANY
LOCAL JURISDICTIONS CONTINUE TO
PROCESS BROADBAND PERMITS ONE AT
A TIME LIMIT PERMIT MATCHING OR
HAVE THE PERMITS GO THROUGH
SEVERAL DIFFERENT DEPARTMENTS AT
VARIOUS TIMES, WHICH
UNNECESSARILY DELAYS AND ALREADY
BUREAUCRATIC PROCESS. THIS BILL
WILL HELP BOTH PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE SECTOR BROADBAND
PROJECTS. SERVE YOUR
CONSTITUENTS IN MONTHS. INSTEAD
OF YEARS. THE PUBLIC IS COUNTING
ON ALL OF US BOTH THE PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE SECTOR TO GET
COMMUNITIES CONNECTED TO HIGH
SPEED INTERNET AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE. CROWN CASTLE IS A
PARTNER IN THIS EFFORT. AND WE
THANK YOU FOR YOUR I VOTE. CHAIR
WITH ME. IT'S ALSO MR AWAIT FOR
DIRECTOR OF ADVOCACY AND POLICY
FOR THE LOS ANGELES GOING TO
BUSINESS FEDERATION. WELCOME
THANK YOU. CHAIR AND MEMBERS. MY
NAME IS SARAH WALT PHªN, THE
DIRECTOR OF POLICY AND ADVOCACY
FOR THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
BUSINESS FEDERATION ON BEHALF OF
OUR 240 BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS
REPRESENTING 420,000 EMPLOYERS
WITH 5 MILLION EMPLOYEES
THROUGHOUT LOS ANGELES COUNTY,
WE ASK YOU TO SUPPORT A B 9 65.
THIS BILL WILL STRENGTHEN
CALIFORNIA'S ECONOMY BECAUSE IT
WILL CREATE A MORE CONSISTENT
BROADBAND PERMITTING PROCESS,
ALLOWING PROJECTS TO BE BUILT
QUICKER. 75% OF CALIFORNIA
VOTERS SUPPORT THIS VOTERS,
BUSINESSES AND EMPLOYEES ALL
WANT STREAMLINED, PERMITTING
PROCESSES FOR BROADBAND PROJECTS
BECAUSE WE ALL BENEFIT FROM TELE
HEALTH TO EDUCATION, PUBLIC
SAFETY TO JOB CREATION, HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY THROUGH REMOTE
WORK. AND THE ASSOCIATED
EMISSION REDUCTIONS. ALL OF THIS
IS MADE POSSIBLE THROUGH HIGH
SPEED INTERNET ACCESS. IN THE
COMING YEARS. WE'RE GOING TO SEE
A HUGE INFLUX OF BROADBAND
PROJECTS AS A RESULT OF PUBLIC
AND PRIVATE INVESTMENTS. WE ARE
FACING A DECEMBER 2024 DEADLINE
TO SPEND BILLIONS OF FEDERAL
BROADBAND DOLLARS OR RISK LOSING
THAT MAYBE 9 65 CREATES A
FRAMEWORK WHERE BROADBAND
INSTALLERS CAN SUBMIT A BATCH OF
NEARLY IDENTICAL BROADBAND
PERMITS TO LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
AT THE SAME TIME, IN ORDER TO
FOR THOSE PERMITS TO BE
REVIEWED. AND ACTED ON IN A
REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME. MAYBE
9 65 IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT
BECAUSE IT WILL HELP COMMUNITIES
GET CONNECTED TO HIGH SPEED
INTERNET IN MONTHS INSTEAD OF
YEARS, STILL STRIKES THE RIGHT
BALANCE WITH LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
AND RETAINS LOCAL CONTROLS. AND
FOR THAT, WE ASK FOR YOUR I
VOTE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. WE
WILL WE HAVE A MAIN WITNESS THAT
IS NOTIFIED OUR OFFICE THAT THEY
WOULD LIKE TO TESTIFY. IS THERE
PAUL MCGAVIN? THIRD UM, HE'S MY
COLLEAGUE. HE'S STUCK IN TRAFFIC
. CAN I HAVE HIS TIME FOR FOUR
MINUTES TOTAL. THIS IS A VERY
COMPLICATED ISSUE, AND I THINK
JUST THE EQUAL THE AMOUNT OF YOU
KNOW THAT'S FINE. WE HAVE HIM
DOWN. SO IF YOU'RE TAKING HIS
PLACE, BUT ALSO HAVE TIME. SO
FOR FOUR MINUTES TOTAL. SORRY
YOU'RE JUST GOING TO GET THE TWO
MINUTES, SO IF YOU WANT TO
TESTIFY AS A WITNESS HAVE A SEAT
AND WE'LL HAPPY TO OR YOU CAN
TESTIFY FROM WHERE YOU WHERE YOU
ARE. BUT YOU HAVE TWO MINUTES
NEXT WHENEVER YOU WANT. FLOOR IS
YOURS. TWO MINUTES. UM PLEASE
ASK ME QUESTIONS SO I CAN
EXPLAIN FURTHER. MY NAME IS
KEVIN MODELS. I'VE BEEN WORKING
IN THE AREA OF BROADBAND
PERMITTING FOR THE PAST 10 YEARS
WITH CONGRESS IN DC I'M A
MEDICAL SOCIAL WORKER. DO NOT
PASS THIS BILL BECAUSE IT WILL
BE VERY COSTLY TO THE STATE,
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND CITIZENS
TRYING TO PROTECT THE VALUE OF
THEIR PROPERTY. 89 65 ALLOWS
WIRELESS COMPANIES TO BATCH
THEIR CELL TOWER APPLICATIONS 50
OR MORE. IF NOT, IF NOT
PROCESSED WITHIN 60 TO 90 DAYS,
THEY WILL BE DEEMED APPROVED.
THIS BILL ALSO INCLUDES WORDING
THAT THIS IS A MATTER OF
STATEWIDE CONCERN, NOT MUNICIPAL
CONCERN, CUTTING OUT LOCAL INPUT
AND CONTROL COMPLETELY. UM
CONSIDER THE ECONOMIC COST OF
MORE RESIDENTS LEAVING THE STATE
AS WE GIVE AWAY RESIDENTS RIGHTS
TO PROTECT THEIR PROPERTY VALUE
. ALSO CONSIDER BUSINESS,
LEAVING THE STATE FOR REAL HIGH
SPEED OF HIGH SPEED BROADBAND.
FIBER TO THE PREMISES, WHICH IS
WHAT OTHER STATES ARE ARE
PROVIDING. ALSO, KEEP IN MIND
THIS FEDERAL FUNDING FROM THE
FEDS, WHICH I UNDERSTAND VERY
THOROUGHLY REQUIRES SPEEDS THAT
CANNOT BE PROVIDED BY WIRELESS
NEED TO BE FIBER TO THE PREMISE,
SO WILL NOT HELP US BRING DOWN
THOSE FUNDS. UH WITH THIS BILL,
WE HAVE COMPLETELY LOST THE
BALANCE BETWEEN BUSINESS AND
COMMUNITY NEEDS. THIS IS THE
WORST PERMITTING ACCELERATION
BILL I HAVE SEEN IN TERMS OF
UNINTENDED COSTS. KEEP IN MIND.
THIS BILL WILL ALLOW WIRELESS
COMPANIES TO SUE LOCAL AND STATE
GOVERNMENTS IF THEIR
TRANSMITTERS ARE NOT DEEMED
APPROVED, NO MATTER WHERE THEY
CHOOSE TO PUT THEM, EVEN IF IT'S
IN FRONT OF YOUR HOME. CONSIDER
THE POLITICAL COST. I HAVE SEEN
COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED TO UNSEAT
ELECTED OFFICIALS OVER ONE
POORLY PLACED TRANSMITTER. THIS
WILL BE 50 AT A TIME. THIS WILL
INSIGHTS COMMUNITIES TO POOL
RESOURCES AND SUE STATE AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENT. CONSIDER UH
THE INCREASE IN LEGAL DEFENSE
COSTS WIRELESS COMPANIES HAVE
SPENT $30 MILLION DEFENDING A
CONGLOMERATION OF DOZENS OF
STATE LAWSUITS IN D C, INVOLVING
WIRELESS CANCER AND NEUROLOGICAL
EFFECTS. CAN YOU BRING YOUR
COMMENTS TO A CLOSE? OKAY UM,
THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS
CONSIDERING WHETHER TO INCREASE
UM, THE CLASSIFICATION OF
WIRELESS AS A POSSIBLE
CARCINOGEN TO A CLASS ONE HUMAN
CARCINOGEN BASED ON AN NIH
NATIONAL INSTITUTE.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES
STUDIES THAT FOUND CLEAR
EVIDENCE OF CANCER AND DNA
DAMAGE. ALSO KEEP IN MIND THAT
THE ITALIAN COURTS HAVE MADE A
CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN WIRELESS AND
CANCER. NONE OF THIS HAS BEEN
TAKEN IN ACCOUNT BY OUR FCC.
THAT'S A CAPTURED COMMISSION. WE
NEED TO BE PROTECTING OUR
RESIDENTS. UM, A VERY WELL
ESTABLISHED RISK. THANK YOU AND
USING FIBER TO THE PREMISE,
WHICH IS WHAT OTHER STATES OTHER
COUNTRIES ARE USING TO COMPETE
AND TO CREATE REAL JOB GROWTH
HAS EXPIRED. NOW, IF YOU'D LIKE
YOU CAN HAVE A SEAT AS A AS A
WITNESS, AND IF THERE ARE
QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE,
THEN YOU WILL BE AVAILABLE AND
THEY CAN PLEASE NOT NOT. YOU CAN
COME AND SIT RIGHT HERE UP
FRONT. YOU LIKE. WE'LL TURN TO
THE PUBLIC. IF YOU HAVE ANY,
THERE IS ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD
LIKE TO TESTIFY. UM, NAME
ORGANIZATION. AND POSITION ON
THE BILL. EITHER IN FAVOR OR
OPPOSED. GOOD MORNING, AMANDA.
WELL DRUM WITH CAL BROAD. FOR US
TELECOM, THE BROADBAND
ASSOCIATION. AMANDA WELL DRAMA
WITH CAL BROADBAND AND SUPPORT
ALSO HERE FOR US TELECOMS
BROADBAND ASSOCIATION AND
SUPPORT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
CHAIR MEMBERS, JONATHAN AARON
BELL ON BEHALF OF SETIA, THE
TRADE ASSOCIATION FOR THE
WIRELESS INDUSTRY ALSO IN
SUPPORT. I LIKE PLAYING WITH THE
SILICON VALLEY LEADERSHIP GROUP
IN SUPPORT. SHARING MEMBERS.
NATE SULLIVAN BEHALF OF THE
FOLLOWING ORGANIZATIONS. YOU
CAN'T BE HERE TODAY. BAY AREA
COUNCIL CALIFORNIA APARTMENT
ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA BUILDING
INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA
BUSINESS PROPERTIES ASSOCIATION
, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
, CALIFORNIA COMMUNICATIONS
ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA WIRELESS
ASSOCIATION, CONSOLIDATED
COMMUNICATIONS, FRONTIER
COMMUNICATIONS. SAN FRANCISCO
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SAN MATEO
COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ASSOCIATION IN THE WIRELESS
INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION. ALL
IN SUPPORT. THANK YOU. THANK
YOU. PATRICK ULTRA CALIFORNIA
MUNICIPAL UTILITY ASSOCIATION
OPPOSED THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS
THERE ANYONE ELSE FROM THE
PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO
COMMENT? SEE NOW I'M GONNA BRING
IT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE. ARE
THERE QUESTIONS IS THERE IS
THERE A MOTION? THE QUESTION. DR
WEBBER. TO THE OPPOSITION. UM. I
GUESS MY QUESTION IS. DID YOU
HAVE ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU DID
NOT GET A CHANCE TO SAY THAT YOU
THINK THE COMMITTEE SHOULD TAKE
INTO CONSIDERATION BEFORE WE
VOTE? YEAH I THINK THAT THANK
YOU VERY MUCH. SO, IN TERMS OF,
UM KIND OF CONCERNS OF LIABILITY
. THERE IS A FEDERAL CASE, UM,
LOOKING AT CELL PHONES AND
CANCER THAT COULD BECOME A CLASS
ACTION LAWSUIT. THIS COULD MEAN
CATASTROPHIC LIABILITY FOR
CALIFORNIA. UM GIVEN GIVEN THE
NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING
TO BE EXPOSED BY THESE NEW
TRANSMITTERS. ALSO KEEP IN MIND
THAT NO REINSURANCE THE STATE IS
SELF INSURED, BUT IT HAS
REINSURANCE. NÓ REINSURANCE
COVERS BIOLOGICAL AND HEALTH
EFFECTS. FROM WIRELESS
TECHNOLOGY FROM WIRELESS
EMISSIONS, AND THAT'S BECAUSE
THE ITALIAN COURTS HAVE RULED
CLEARLY THAT THERE IS A CAUSAL
LINK BETWEEN WIRELESS AND
CANCER. UM THE, UH, THE OTHER
THING TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT, UM,
IN TERMS OF COST. WE'VE BEEN
TALKING ABOUT REDUCING THE
CARBON FOOTPRINTS, THE COST OF
SPENDING TO REDUCE OUR CARBON
FOOTPRINTS, WHICH THE CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA HAS INVESTED IN
GREATLY GIVEN THAT WIRELESS IS A
BIG ENERGY WASTER. IF YOU THINK
ABOUT WIRELESS IT SPRAYS
EMISSIONS ALL OVER USES VERY
LITTLE FOR ACTUAL CONNECTION.
ALL THAT IS WASTED. CURRENTLY IT
IS ESTIMATED THAT 20% OF OUR
ENTERING ENERGY CONSUMPTION IS
USED BY WIRELESS AND ITS
INFRASTRUCTURE. UM AND THAT BY
2030 WITH FIVE G 30% OF THAT
WILL BE, UH, WILL BE USED FOR
WIRELESS AND WIRELESS
INFRASTRUCTURE. THE FEDS
UNDERSTAND THIS. THAT'S WHY IN
THEIR STATE GRANTS THEY HAVE PUT
IN PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. THAT
ARE AIMED AT 100 MEGABYTES UP
AND DOWN SYMMETRICAL, WHICH CAN
ONLY BE PROVIDED BY FIBER TO THE
PREMISE. OTHER STATES ARE USING
FIBER TO THE PREMISE AND
GENERATING TREMENDOUS ECONOMIC
GROWTH AND JOBS, GROWTH AND
INCREASED TAX REVENUE. THAT'S A
LOST OPPORTUNITY COSTS. UM IF
YOU WERE TO PLAY WITH THIS BILL
UH, CAN I JUST INTERRUPT FOR
JUST A MOMENT? I APPRECIATE THE
MEMBER GIVING YOU AN OPPORTUNITY
TO HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, BUT
WE'RE NOT GOING TO GO ON
ENDLESSLY WITH A LOT OF SO IF
THERE IS A KEY POINT YOU WANT TO
TAKE THE NEXT 30 SECONDS TO MAKE
30 SECONDS WOULD BE GREAT. THANK
YOU, SIR. I APPRECIATE IT. YEAH
UH, TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE
INCREASED COST FOR CYBER CYBER
CRIME AND CYBER SECURITY. UM
GIVEN WITH THIS BILL, BECAUSE
YOU HAVE THOUSANDS MORE OF ENTRY
POINTS. UM ALSO TAKE INTO
ACCOUNT. UM UH, THE REVENUES ARE
GONNA BE LOSING TO THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT. AND THEN THE CARBON
DID IT. OKAY UM, A GOOD PLACE TO
END. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR
YOUR COMMENTS. IS THERE ANYONE
ELSE ON THE PANEL THAT WOULD
LIKE TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS OF ANY
OF THEM? THE WITNESSES OR THE
AUTHOR. IS THERE A MOTION? WITH
THE MASTER. MATHIS HAS MADE THE
MOTIONS SECOND BY MISTAKE. WOULD
YOU LIKE TO CLOSE? MR KRIEL JUST
WANT TO SAY THANK YOU MEMBERS
FOR ALLOW ME TO PRESENT THIS
BILL, AND I JUST RESPECT MY
VOTE. THANK YOU. BILL IS OUT ON
A ROLL CALL. THANK YOU. MR TING
, YOU HAVE TWO BILLS A B 4 80.
OH I'M SORRY. MR GARCIA WAS
FIRST. GARCIA. MAYBE 9 18. THERE
WAS A DO PASS. CHECK ALL THE
JUDGES ANALYSIS STATES THE BILL
BEFORE YOU HAS NO FISCAL IMPACT.
THIS IS A LOCAL ISSUE LOCAL
SOLUTIONS TO LOCAL ISSUE
ADDRESSING HEALTHCARE CRISIS IN
IMPERIAL COUNTY RESPECTFULLY ASK
FOR A VOTE. THIS IS A B A B 9
18, OKAY? IT WAS MOVED BY
CALDERON AND ORTEGA. WE'LL TURN
TO THE PUBLIC. IS THERE ANYONE
IN THE PUBLIC WHO WOULD LIKE TO
COMMENT ON THE BILL? SO YOU
KNOW, WE'LL BRING IT BACK TO THE
COMMITTEE. QUESTIONS. WOULD YOU
LIKE TO CLOSE? RESPECTFULLY AS
FREE CABLE BILL IS OUT ON A ROLL
CALL. AND YOU'RE ALSO HERE TO
PRESENT A B 15 33 FOR THE
COMMITTEE. THAT'S CORRECT, MR
CHAIR AND AGAIN AS THE ANALYSIS
STATES MINIMAL IMPACT TO THE
STATE BUDGET. THIS IS A MUST
BUILD FOR THE COMMITTEE.
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR MY VOTE.
WE'LL TURN TO THE PUBLIC. IS
THERE ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC THEY
WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON THE
BILL. NONE WILL BRING IT BACK TO
THE COMMITTEE. BILL IS OUT ON A
ROLL CALL. WITH DOLLY NOT
BUILDING. OKAY, MR TANG. YOU
HAVE A B 4 80? MAYBE 10 33.
THANK YOU, MR CHAIRMAN. IF IT'S
OKAY, I'D LIKE TO PRESENT A
BEFORE 81ST. 84 82
REINTRODUCTION OF MY BILL. MAYBE
2357 WHICH PASSED OUT THE
COMMITTEE LAST YEAR. THE BILL
HAS MINOR AND ABSORBABLE COSTS
FOR HC D MINOR COST TO LOCAL
AGENCIES TO ENACT THE BILL. THE
BILL STRENGTHENS THE SURPLUS
LANDS ACT BY CLOSING ENFORCEMENT
LOOPHOLES FOR LANDS THAT ARE
LEAST AND LAND THAT ARE SOLD FOR
LESS THAN MARKET VALUE.
RESPECTFULLY ASK PRIVATE ON A B
4 80. MEMBER OF THE SO THE
PUBLIC IS THERE ANYONE YOU WOULD
LIKE TO COMMENT WILL WELCOME
YOUR COMMENTS NOW. GOOD MORNING
CHAIRMAN MEMBERS BRIAN AUGUSTA
ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST
LAW PROJECT, ONE OF THE CO
SPONSORS OF THIS MEASURE. WILL
HELP INCREASE THE SUPPLY OF
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND WE WOULD
URGENTLY VOTE. THANK YOU. JIM
LIGHTS ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS, COUNCIL AND
SUPPORT. ETHAN NAGLER ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY OF CORONA AND
RESPECTFUL OPPOSITION. ANYONE
ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A
COMMENT FROM THE PUBLIC? BRING
BACK TO THE COMMITTEE. TOM
SECOND HAPPEN. IF YOU LIKE TO
CLOSE. JUST ASK FOR YOUR PHONE.
GONNA BE REAL CALLED. AND 33. IF
I COULD BE UP TO 100% MAYBE 10
33. THIS REMOVES THE STATE'S
PROHIBITION AROUND SEPARATELY,
CONVEYING 80 US AND ALLOWING IT
USED TO BE SOLD AS CONDOS AND
HOLIEST CONDOS. THE BILL HAS AN
OPT IN PROVISION TO ALLOW
EIGHTIES SEPARATELY CONVEYED,
MEANING CITIES WOULD HAVE TO OPT
IN TO ALLOW THEIR RESIDENTS TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE LAW. THE BILL
HAS NO COST TO THE STATE AND
MINOR COST TO LOCALS RESPECT
FAST. FIVE VOTE ON A B 10 33.
TURN TO THE PUB OR YOU HAVE A
WITNESS WITNESS. GOOD MORNING,
MR CHAIR MEMBERS. MY NAME IS
LUIS MARTIN, VICE PRESIDENT
PUBLIC POLICY WITH THE BARRY
COUNCIL. ONE OF THE SPONSORS OF
THIS BILL IN THE CITIES AROUND
THIS COUNTRY THAT ALLOW EDU
CONDOS EDU CONDOS SELL FOR
BETWEEN 30 60% LOWER THAN
COMMENSURATE HOMES IN THE SAME
NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT'S A REAL
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND HOME
OWNERSHIP OPPORTUNITY THAT WE'RE
EXCITED ABOUT. THE BILL HAS NO
COST TO THE STATE BECAUSE ANY,
UH, MANDATE WOULD NOT BE
REIMBURSABLE AS LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS CAN RECOVER FOR ANY
ANY COSTS PROGRAM CREATES FROM
FEES ON HOUSING. I URGE YOUR
SUPPORT. THANKS. THANK YOU. ANY
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. ETHAN
NAGLE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
EAST VILLE AND RESPECTFUL
OPPOSITION. OPPOSITION. WE DON'T
HAVE YOU AS A WE DON'T HAVE A
WITNESS. THIS IS REALLY JUST
TAKING AT THIS POINT PUBLIC
COMMENT. NAME ORGANIZATION AND
POSITION ON THE BILL. YOU'RE NOT
ONE OF THE WITNESSES THAT WE
DON'T HAVE A WITNESS LIST THAT
HAS YOUR TELL ME YOUR NAME. WE
HAVE NO ONE DOWN TO SPEAK IN
OPPOSITION AS A WITNESS. RESPECT
ON BEHALF OF THE. JENNIFER SPEAK
ON BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS. WE HAVE
EXPRESSED OPPOSITION TO THE BILL
IN PREVIOUS COMMITTEES. I WAS
UNAWARE THAT WE HAD TO SUBMIT A
REQUEST TO TESTIFY. IS THAT A
NEW PROCESS? NO BUT WE'LL GIVE.
WE'LL GIVE YOU THE COURTESY TO
MY SINCEREST APOLOGIES. I WILL.
I WILL MAKE SURE TO CHECK IN
WITH COMMITTEE STOP NEXT TIME.
THE REALTORS, AMONG OTHER REAL
ESTATE BUSINESS SERVICE
ORGANIZATIONS, INCLUDED WITHIN
THE COALITION LETTER CONTINUE TO
OPPOSE A B 10 33. DESPITE RECENT
AMENDMENTS, MAYBE 10 33
CONTINUES TO COME WITH THE
POTENTIAL FOR IMMENSE UNINTENDED
FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES TO
HOMEOWNERS AND LENDERS. AS IT
PERMITS THE SEPARATE SALE OF AWS
USING AN UPSIDE DOWN CONDO
MAPPING MAPPING PROCESS WHILE
SIMULTANEOUSLY CONTINUING TO
OPEN THE DOOR TO ANY FORM OF
CONVEYANCE AS THE BELL IS SILENT
ON THOSE BOTH FREDDIE MAE AND
FREDDIE MAC'S CONVENTIONAL
LENDING RULES ARE CLEAR TO US
MUST BE ENCUMBERED WITH THE
MORTGAGE WITH THE PRIMARY
DWELLING, WHICH IS ENUMERATED IN
FANNIE MAE SERVICE AND GUIDE
SUBPART B TO CHAPTER B 2-3. WELL
WE ARE AWARE OF THE PRACTICES IN
OREGON AND TEXAS. THOSE ARE
ACTIVITIES APPEAR TO BE IN
CONFLICT WITH EXISTING FEDERAL
LENDING RULES THAT IN ADDITION
TO PROHIBITING THE SEPARATE SALE
OF AWS LIMITED TO ONE PER PARCEL
AND PROHIBITS THE ENTERPRISES
FROM PURCHASING LOANS WERE 80 US
ARE PRESENT ON A DUPLEX TRIPLEX
OR FOUR PLEX LOT. FREDDIE MAC'S
SERVICING RULE. 5000 CHAPTER 56
1 POINT TO FOLLOW THE SAME MODEL
FOR ELIGIBILITY AS FANNIE MAE,
AS DOES CALIPHATE WHO WAS
CONFORMED TO THESE SAME
SERVICING RULES. WE HAVE ALSO
LEARNED THAT 80 DEVELOPERS AND
LENDERS IN AUSTIN, TEXAS, AND
PORTLAND, OREGON, ARE ASKING FOR
FORGIVENESS, NOT FOR PERMISSION
FROM OUR FEDERAL REGULATORS AS
THEY'RE USING A LOOPHOLE IN THE
FEDERAL ENTERPRISES WAIVER OF
PROJECT RULE TO FACILITATE THE
NON REVIEWED CONDO CONVERSIONS,
WHICH HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR
DISASTROUS FINANCIAL
CONSEQUENCES TO CONSUMERS WHO
COULD BE SUBJECT TO FORECLOSURE
FOR VIOLATING AN EXPLICITLY
PROHIBITED ACTIVITY. THIS IS
VERY DANGEROUS AS A DEVELOPER,
DEVELOPERS ARE PLAYING A GAME
WITH HOMEOWNERS AND LENDERS
ASSETS GIVEN CALIFORNIA'S
EXPERIENCE WITH PACE OVER THE
LAST DECADE AND A HALF
HOMEOWNERS SPLITTING THEIR LOTS
INTO CONDOS. PURSUANT TO MAYBE
10 33 WILL UNLOAD ONLY BE
LIMITED TO HARD MONEY LOANS,
WHICH CARRY MUCH HIGHER INTEREST
RATES IN SOME INSTANCES, DOUBLE
TO TRIPLE OFFERED TO
CONVENTIONAL, UH, FINANCING
OPPORTUNITIES. I WANT TO BE
CLEAR ESTABLISHING A CONDO
CONVERSION AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF
AN 80, YOU WILL LIKELY BE SEEN
AS AN END RUN AROUND FEDERAL
SERVICING GUIDELINES AND
HOMEOWNERS WHO PARTICIPATE IN 10
33 WILL EXPERIENCE GREAT
FINANCIAL LOSSES CURRENTLY
DRAFTED. ON ONE FINAL NOTE. THE
REALTORS FEEL IT IS IMPERATIVE
THAT A B 10 33 AND A MINIMUM
ALSO CONTAINED AN OWNER
OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENT SIMILAR TO
THAT WHICH WAS INCLUDED IN SP
NINE BY PRO TEM ATKINS IN 2021.
UNTIL ALL OF OUR CONCERNS ARE
RESOLVED. WE RESPECTFULLY
REQUEST A NO VOTE ON A B 10 33
BUT CONTINUE TO LOOK FORWARD TO
WORKING WITH THE AUTHOR AND HIS
STUFF. IS THERE ANYONE FROM THE
PUBLIC THEY WOULD LIKE TO JUST
MAKE A COMMENT REGARDING THEIR
POSITION ON THE BILL. THE NAME
AND ORGANIZATION OF ANY GOOD
MORNING, INDIRA MCDONALD ON
BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA
MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION,
RESPECTFULLY OPPOSED. IS THERE
ANYONE ELSE? OKAY WE'LL COME
BACK TO THE COMMITTEE AND SEE IF
THERE'S ANY COMMENTS OR
QUESTIONS ON BEING HALF OF
POSITION ON THE BILL. SEEING
NONE OF THEIR EMOTION. LOWENTHAL
WOULD YOU LIKE TO CLOSE? JUST
VERY QUICKLY. UM AGAIN, UH, I
THINK THAT THERE IS A LOT OF
JARGON AND OPPOSITIONS. UH
TESTIMONY BUT LET ME JUST BE
VERY CLEAR. THIS IS NOTHING TO
DO WITH PACE LOANS. I'M SORRY
FOR ALL THE FOLKS WHO HAD A
NEGATIVE EXPERIENCE WITH PASTE
LOANS. PACE LOANS WERE LOANS
THAT WERE ATTACHED TO OUR
PROPERTY TAXES FOR CLEAN ENERGY.
OR FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY. THIS
IS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT. THIS
IS NO DIFFERENT THAN A DUPLEX OR
TRIPLEX GOING THROUGH A CONDO
CONVERSION PROCESS. THERE ARE
VERY SET RULES ON HOW TO DO
THAT. THERE SAID FINANCING AND
IN TERMS OF FINANCING YOU AT THE
VERY END OF IT GO THROUGH A
REFINANCING PROCESS. I KNOW
BECAUSE I'VE GONE THROUGH A
CONDO CONVERSION PROCESS WITH ME
AND MY FAMILY WHERE WE TOOK A
DUPLEX AND WENT THROUGH THAT
CONDO CONVERSION PROCESS. THIS
WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT. YOU HAVE
HOMEOWNER'S PROPERTY IS DOING
THAT ALL OVER THE STATE ALREADY
AGAIN BY OUR OUR LAWS, OUR BILLS
TO CONFORM WITH THAT PROCESS. WE
ARE WORKING VERY, VERY CLOSELY
WITH THE LENDERS AND WE
ANTICIPATE THAT WE'LL BE ABLE TO
GET THEIR OPPOSITION OFF.
HOPEFULLY, BY THE TIME WE
REACHED THE FLOOR, UNFORTUNATELY
WITH THE REALTORS, IT IS A
LITTLE BIT PUZZLING HOW THE
REALTORS WOULD BE OPPOSED TO, UM
. YOU KNOW, REALLY, TO A BILL
THAT WOULD OFFER THEIR
MEMBERSHIP A LOT MORE
OPPORTUNITIES TO SELL HOMES AS
WELL AS OPEN UP HOMEOWNERSHIP
OPPORTUNITIES FOR MANY
CALIFORNIANS WITHOUT RESPECT FOR
RATIFYING VOTE ON MAYBE 10 33.
THANK YOU. THE BILL IS OUT ON
THE B ROLL CALL. THIS WORKS.
PRESENTING ON A B 13 19. ENJOY
AM THANK YOU, MR CHAIR AND
MEMBERS. MAYBE 13 19 AND NEXT
TARGETED MODIFICATIONS TO
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE OF BARRY
HOUSING FINANCING AUTHORITY,
ALSO KNOWN AS BUFFER BUFFET IS
GOVERNED BY MTC AND A BAG THE
SPONSORS OF THIS BILL AND
GETTING BACK UP AND RUNNING
THEIR DAY AND PARTNERS IN THE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMUNITY
NOTICED THAT THERE WERE A
HANDFUL OF PLACES WHERE THE LAW
ONE LACKED CLARITY TO MADE
IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGING OR
THREE DIDN'T REFLECT RECENT
EVOLUTIONS IN BEST PRACTICES.
THIS BILL ADDRESSES THESE ISSUES
SO THAT BOPHA CAN BEST FULFILL
THE MISSION TO HELP ENSURE
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY FOR LOWER
INCOME RESIDENTS OF THE BAY AREA
. UM, THIS HAS NO STATE COSTS
AND, UH MINOR LOCAL COSTS. UM WE
HAVE NO PRIMARY WITNESSES HERE
TO TESTIFY TODAY. I WOULD
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR AND I VOTE.
MIKE. MOVE MY LOWENTHAL. IS
THERE ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC
THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON
BEHALF OF THE SPILL OR AN
OPPOSITION? SAYING NONE. WOULD
YOU LIKE TO CLOSE? RESPECTFULLY
ASK FOR MY VOTE. THE BILL IS OUT
ON THE B ROLL CALL.
MR LOWE. I DIDN'T SEE YOU
SITTING BACK. THERE WASN'T FOR
COLOR. THAT'S TRUE. PRESENTING
MAYBE 99 96. THANK YOU VERY
MUCH. MR AARON COULD BE MEMBERS.
MAYBE 96 RECORDS THE D C. BOARD
AND BUREAUS. DO YOU HAVE A
CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND
RESPECTFULLY AS FRIABLE? MINOR
IN ANGEL. THANK YOU. BEEN
MOVING. THERE'S A SECOND PUBLIC
COMMENT ON THE BILL. YOU KNOW,
THE BILL IS OUT ON A ROLL CALL.
BRIAN. FOR BERMAN.
HMM. WELCOME YOU'RE HERE TO
PRESENT MR BERMAN'S BILL. 15 98
IT DOESN'T YOU ENJOY DO PASS?
THANK YOU, MR CHAIR, MR CHAIR
AND COLLEAGUES. I'M HERE TO
PRESENT A B 15 98 ON BEHALF OF
ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S BERMAN AND
THAT'S HIS NEW CO AUTHOR TO THIS
BILL, THIS BILL WOULD EXPAND
WHAT IS COVERED IN THE FIREARM
SAFETY CERTIFICATION TEST TO
EXPLICITLY INCLUDE THE POTENTIAL
CONSEQUENCES OF BRINGING A
FIREARM INTO THE HOME AS WELL AS
INFORMATION ABOUT RESTRAINING
ORDERS. THIS BILL WOULD ALSO
REQUIRE THAT A PAMPHLET COVERING
THE BENEFITS AND RISKS OF OWNING
A FIREARM BE GIVEN TO ALL
PERSPECTIVE. FIREARM PURCHASERS.
AS THE ANALYSIS NOTES, THIS IS
MINOR COST OF THE STATE. WE
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR I
VOTE. IN MOOD BY HALLORAN.
SECOND BY PAULA REMEMBER FROM
THE PUBLIC THEY WOULD LIKE TO
COMMENT. ETHAN NAGLER ON BEHALF
OF THE CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW AND
SUPPORT. SEEING NO ONE ELSE.
HERE TO TESTIFY. WE WILL. THIS
BILL IS NOT GONNA BE REAL COLD.
LET'S SEE MISS DIXON YOU'RE
PRESENTING FOR WALDRON. A B 17
41 DO PASS.
PLEASE THANK YOU, MR CHAIR. GOOD
MORNING, AND MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE. I AM PRESENTING A B
17 41 ON BEHALF OF ASSEMBLYWOMAN
WALDRON, THE CLINICAL AB
INDUSTRY IS FACING A WORKFORCE
SHORTAGE, ESPECIALLY WITH
CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENTISTS.
A B 17 41 SEEKS TO ADDRESS THIS
WORKFORCE SHORTAGE BY ALLOWING
QUALIFIED UNLICENSED PERSONNEL
TO CONDUCT CERTAIN TASKS UNDER
THE SUPERVISION OF A LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL. THIS WILL ALLOW
LABORATORIES TO MEET HIGH
TESTING DEMAND WHILE MAINTAINING
ACCESS TO ACCURATE CARE. THESE
CHANGES WILL ADDRESS WORKFORCE
SHORTAGES AND LABS, IMPROVED
TESTING CAPACITY AND CREATE NEW
JOBS IN THE INDUSTRY. AS THE
COMMITTEE HAS NOTED IN THE
ANALYSIS, THE BILL HAS MINOR AND
ABSORBABLE COSTS TO THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
HEALTH. WE HAVE WORKED WITH THE
OPPOSITION TO ACCEPT A SERIES OF
AMENDMENTS IN THE ASSEMBLY
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS
COMMITTEE. THERE IS ONE
OUTSTANDING ISSUE DEALING WITH
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE THAT WE
ARE CONTINUING TO WORK WITH
OPPOSITION TO ADDRESS I HAVE A
REPRESENTATIVE FROM QUEST
DIAGNOSED PLASTICS AND THE
CALIFORNIA CLINICAL LABORATORY
ASSOCIATION HERE TO TESTIFY IN
SUPPORT AND ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS. GOOD MORNING, MIKE
ROBSON HERE ON BEHALF OF QUEST
DIAGNOSTICS WERE CO SPONSOR ON
THE BILL. I THINK SOME OF THE
MEMBER DIXON, UM, EXPLAINED THE
BILL PRETTY WELL, AND THERE'S
MINOR ABSORBABLE FISCAL ON IT
AND AGAIN TO REITERATE WE ARE
WORKING WITH THE OPPOSITION ON
THE LAST REMAINING ISSUE, AND
YOU KNOW, AND IF WE WERE HOPEFUL
TO RESOLVE THAT, AND AS WE WRITE
VOTE UH, MICHAEL ARNOLD WITH THE
CALIFORNIA CLINICAL LABORATORY
ASSOCIATION. UM WE HAVE A REAL
CRISIS AND THE LABORATORIES
THESE DAYS BECAUSE MANY OF OUR R
CLS S ARE RETIRING. UH AND WE
NEED TO DO SOMETHING TO ADDRESS
THE NEED OR WE AREN'T GOING TO
BE ABLE TO PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY
LABORATORY SERVICES. THIS BILL
IS GOING TO HELP US DO THAT, AND
WE STRONGLY URGE YOUR SUPPORT.
BEEN MOVED BY THE VICE CHAIR.
THEIR SECOND. SECOND BY MEMBER
HEART. RETURN TO THE PUBLIC ANY
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC SAYING
NONE. THIS BILL IS OUT ON A ROLL
CALL WITH ORTEGA, NOT VOTING.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE'RE GOING
TO GIVE A COURTESY FOR DR WEBBER
TO PRESENT AT THIS POINT. AND
THAT YOU'RE PRESENTING ON A B 10
11 ENJOYS A DO PASS.
GOOD MORNING CHAIR AND MEMBERS.
THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO
PRESENT A B 10 11, WHICH IS THE
FIRST STEP IN ADDRESSING A
CRITICAL NEW FRONTIER OF PRIVACY
POLICY. THIS DEFINES THE NEW
TECHNOLOGY AND LAW PREVENTS ANY
ORGANIZATION OR COMPANY FROM
SELLING PRIVATE SENSITIVE
CONSUMER DATA AND HAS NO COST TO
THE STATE. WE ARE WORKING WITH
THE OPPOSITION AND LOOKING
FORWARD TO CONTINUING
CONVERSATIONS WITH THEM WITH ME
TODAY AND SUPPORT IS JUSTIN FANS
LAW REPRESENTING FIND HELP.
OKAY? GOOD MORNING SPECIAL.
THANK YOU TO SUMMON MEMBER WEBER
FOR AUTHORING THIS PILL. I
REPRESENT FIND HELP WITH THE
SPONSOR OF THE BILL. WE OPERATE
THE CLOSED LOOP REFERRAL SYSTEM
. UM, THAT HELPS PEOPLE FIND
NAVIGATE AND FIND SOCIAL CARE
SERVICES THAT ARE NOT, UM EITHER
PRESCRIBED FROM THEIR DOCTOR OR
THAT THEY THEMSELVES ARE NOT
ABLE TO FIND ON THEIR OWN VERY
HAPPY THAT THE AMENDMENTS THAT
WE WERE ABLE TO WORK THROUGH AND
COMMITTEE AND ARE GLAD TO SEE A
DO PASS HERE TODAY. YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS? I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER.
THANK YOU. I WILL TURN TO PUBLIC
COMMENT. IS THERE ANYONE THAT
LIKE TO COMMENT ON BEHALF OF A
B? 10 11. THANK YOU, MR CHAIR
AND MEMBERS. FAITH CONNOLLY WITH
VITAMIN GROUP ON BEHALF OF
UNITED US HERE IN OPPOSITION,
BUT THANK THE AUTHOR AND SPONSOR
FOR WORKING WITH US CONTINUING
FORWARD. THANK YOU. SEE NO ONE
ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD
LIKE TO SPEAK, WILL TURN TO THE
COMMITTEE. COMMENTS IS THEIR
EMOTION. THANK YOU. BILL IS OUT
ON A ROLL CALL WITH DIXON NOT
VOTING. CARILLO WOULD YOU LIKE
TO PRESENT REMEMBER FRIEDMAN'S
BILL. MAYBE 8 94. YOU PASS.
THANK YOU, MR CHAIR AND MEMBERS.
I AM PRESENTING A B 894. ON
BEHALF OF ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S
FRIEDMAN TODAY, EXCESSIVE
PARKING COMES AT A HIGH ECONOMIC
, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL COSTS
. A B 894 REQUIRES PUBLIC
AGENCIES TO ALLOW UNDERUTILIZED
PARKING SPACES TO BE SHARED WITH
THE PUBLIC, PRIVATE ENTITY OR
OTHER USERS AND REQUIRES PUBLIC
AGENCIES TO ALLOW SHARED PARKING
SPACES TO COUNT TOWARDS PARKING
REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFIC
CIRCUMSTANCES. UNDER THIS BILL,
NO ONE IS FORCED TO REQUIRED TO
SHARE PARKING LOTS. HOWEVER A
PROPERTY OWNERS WANT TO SHARE
THEIR UNDERUTILIZED PARKING LOTS
WITH OTHERS THAT NEED PARKING.
THEY MAY DO SO THIS BILL HAS NO
STATE COST. AND ON BEHALF OF THE
AUTHOR, RESPECTFULLY REQUEST AND
I VOTE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.
GOODBYE. PALIN, SECOND BY HEART.
PUBLIC COMMENT. FAVORITE
PROPOSED. EVEN NAGLER. I'M AFTER
THE CITY OF EAST VAIL AND
RESPECTFUL OPPOSITION. SEE NO
ONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC.
WISHING TO SPEAK. BRING BACK TO
THE COMMITTEE. NO QUESTIONS. THE
BILL IS OUT ON THE B ROLL CALL
WITH MATHIS NOT VOTING. HARD.
MOVE THE BILL. SECOND HOW ABOUT
THAT? I GUESS I GUESS I'M DONE.
UM THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN MEMBERS.
A B 14 12 ALLOWED DEFENDANTS
WITH BORDERLINE PERSONALITY
DISORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR
PRETRIAL DIVERSION PROGRAMS AT
THE DISCRETION OF THE JUDGE. WE
ESTIMATE MAYBE 14 12 B, A
MINIMAL COST TO THE STATE BY
DIVERGING MENTALLY ILL
DEFENDANTS FROM CORRECTIONAL
FACILITIES. INTO EXISTING
TREATMENT PROGRAMS. PRESENTING
WITH ME TODAY IS KATIE MCSWEENEY
WITH THE CALIFORNIA COUNCIL OF
COMMUNITY BEHAVIOR, HELPING THE
AGENCIES. THANK YOU, CHAIR
HOLDEN AND COMMITTEE MEMBERS. MY
NAME IS KATIE MCSWEENEY AND WITH
THE CALIFORNIA COUNCIL OF
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AGENCIES. TBH
A. WE'RE PROUD SPONSORS OF A B
14 12. DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THIS
BILL WILL REDUCE COSTS TO THE
STATE BY DIVERTING CLOSE TO 600
PEOPLE WITH BORDERLINE
PERSONALITY DISORDER INTO
COMMUNITY BASED TREATMENT PER
YEAR? THE LEGISLATIVE ANALYST'S
OFFICE ESTIMATES THAT IT COSTS
ABOUT 106,000. TO INCARCERATE
SOMEONE PER YEAR IN CALIFORNIA.
REDUCING THIS TO A DAILY AVERAGE
MEANS THAT IT COSTS
APPROXIMATELY $290 PER DAY TO
DETAIN SOMEONE IN CALIFORNIA'S
JUSTICE SYSTEM. THEREFORE WE
ANTICIPATE THAT MAYBE 14 12
WOULD SAVE $174,000 FOR EACH DAY
THAT THOSE INDIVIDUALS WERE NOT
INCARCERATED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR
TIME AND CONSIDERATION OF THIS
IMPORTANT MEASURE. THANK YOU.
RETURN TO PUBLIC COMMENT. SEE,
NONE WILL BRING BACK TO THE
COMMITTEE. WE DO HAVE EMOTION.
BILL IS OUT WITH REPUBLICANS NOT
VOTING, AND DIXON AND I. IT'S
HAPPENING. PRESENTING A B 893.
AS I DO PASS. THANK YOU, MR
CHAIR OVER THE PAST 15 YEAR NEW
BUSINESSES. HAVE EMERGED AS
DISRUPTERS, FORCING CHANGE AND
ADAPTATION IN THE CAR RENTAL
SPACE PEER TO BE YOUR RENTAL
PLATFORMS ARE A NEW AVENUE FOR
INDIVIDUALS TO RENT THEIR
PRIVATE VEHICLES TO CONSUMERS.
UNLIKE TRADITIONAL CAR RENTAL
SERVICES, PEER TO PEER RENTALS
DO NOT CURRENTLY ADHERE TO
AIRPORT REGULATION AND THE
UNPERMITTED SHARING OF PRIVATE
VEHICLES SHARING PROGRAM
VEHICLES AT AIRPORTS HAS LED TO
A MYRIAD OF ISSUES, INCLUDING
VEHICLES LEFT BEHIND, ABANDONED
OR WAITING AT A TERMINAL AREAS
FOR LENGTHY PERIODS OF TIME.
INCREASED TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND
A LOSS OF REVENUE. REVENUE WHICH
IS CRITICAL TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC
AIRPORTS ARE NOT A DRAIN ON
TAXPAYERS. MAYBE 893 WILL
REQUIRE, UM PRIVATE VEHICLES
SHARING PLATFORMS TO OBTAIN A
PERMIT PRIOR TO FACILITATING
TRACKED ACTIONS AT AN AIRPORT
AND END THE TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES.
SUBSIDIZATION OF SUCH OPERATIONS
. FURTHERMORE A B 893 WILL
ADDRESS ADDITIONAL GAPS IN
CURRENT LAW REQUIRING PF PF SP
PLATFORMS ADHERE TO TRANSPARENT
PRICE DISCLOSURE REGULATIONS AND
REQUIRE SUCH PLATFORMS TO
CONTRIBUTE TO CALIFORNIA'S
TOURISM MARKETING PROGRAMS. THIS
BILL HAS NO REPORTED STATE COSTS
AND IS EXPECTED TO GENERATE 4
MILLION ANNUALLY IN TOURISM
ASSESSMENTS. A B 8 93 ENSURES
THAT CALIFORNIA IS NOT PICKING
WINNERS AND LOSERS IN AN
INDUSTRY THROUGH APPLYING
REGULATIONS TO ONE BUSINESS AND
NOT ANOTHER WITH ME TO TESTIFY
TODAY IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL IS
JOHN MOFFITT ON BEHALF OF
ENTERPRISE AND JIM LIGHTS WITH
THE CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS
ASSOCIATED COVER AIRPORTS
COUNCIL. WELCOME GOOD MORNING,
MR CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE JOHN MOFFITT ON BEHALF
OF ENTERPRISE APPRECIATE THE
COMMITTEE ANALYSIS ON THIS BILL
, AS IT NOTED, NO STATE COSTS,
UH, AND POTENTIAL NET BENEFIT TO
CALIFORNIA'S TOURISM PROGRAM AND
ON THE AIRPORT RELATED ISSUES.
I'LL DEFER TO MR LIGHTS VOTE
TODAY. GOOD MORNING, MR CHIN.
WHERE'S JIM LIGHTS ON BEHALF OF
THE CALIFORNIA AIRPORTS COUNCIL
. THIS ISSUE HAS A FAIRLY LONG
HISTORY ABOUT SIX YEARS WHEN CAR
SHARE SERVICES BEGAN OPERATING
AT AIRPORTS, UM THEY WERE DOING
SO WITHOUT PERMITS SFO AND LACKS
. BOTH SUED THE PRIMARY COMPANY
IN THIS PARTICULAR MODE. JUDGE
INITIALLY FOUND IN FAVOR OF SFO
IN APRIL OF 2020. SINCE THEN, AS
WE'VE COME OUT OF THE PANDEMIC,
THE CAR SHARE SERVICES HAVE
BEGUN TO SEEK PERMITS AT
AIRPORTS. NOW WHY DO YOU NEED AN
AIRPORT PERMIT? IF YOUR COMPANY
SEEKING TO OFFER GOODS AND
SERVICES TO AIR TRAVEL
PASSENGERS FOR PROFIT, YOU HAVE
TO HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE
AIRPORT, EVERY OTHER MODE OF
AIRPORT GROUND TRANSPORTATION
CURRENTLY HAS PERMITS TAXIS TNCS
LIMOS, LONG DISTANCE COACH
SERVICES ALL HAVE OPERATING
PERMITS TYPICALLY THAT WILL
PROVIDE FOR 10% OF GROSS TO THE
AIRPORT AND IN SOME CASES LIKE
TNCS AND TAXIS, YOU'RE PAYING A
TRIP FEE. AND SO THIS BILL,
SECTION THREE SPECIFICALLY WILL
COMPEL ALL GROUND TRANSPORTATION
SERVICES THAT ADVERTISE AT
AIRPORTS TO ACTUALLY HAVE
PERMITS. AND SO BEFORE TO THIS
POINT, THE STATE HAS NEVER
PLAYED FAVORITES IN TERMS OF ONE
TYPE OF GROUND TRANSPORTATION
SERVICE PROVIDER VERSUS OTHERS.
AND WE THINK SECTION THREE WILL
COMPEL PERMITS FOR ALL PROVIDERS
OF THAT SERVICE. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. CHAIR AND MEMBERS
LORISES SUSPICIOUS HERE ON
BEHALF OF THE EURO AND
OPPOSITION. UM, UNFORTUNATELY TO
THE BILL, WE APPRECIATE THE TIME
SPENT ON THIS BILL. UM YOU KNOW,
TORO HAS ABOUT 20,000 HOSTS IN
CALIFORNIA. THESE ARE
INDIVIDUALS THAT PUT THEIR CAR
ON THE PLATFORM TO EARN MONEY TO
OFFSET THE CAR OF THEIR
VEHICLES. THIS HAS BEEN A THEIR
ABILITY TO DO FOR OVER 10 YEARS
THEY'RE CURRENTLY REGULATED.
THERE ARE CONSUMER PROTECTIONS
REGULATING, UH, THIS INDUSTRY
CURRENTLY IN THE INSURANCE CODE
AND THE VEHICLE CODE.
UNFORTUNATELY WITH THE POSITION
THAT WE'RE IN HERE IS WHERE
THERE IS AN COMPANY ENTERPRISE
THAT IS ATTEMPTING TO CREATE AND
FURTHER A MARKET DISADVANTAGE
FOR TOUR. OH, THIS IS SOMETHING
THAT THEY'VE DONE ACROSS THE
COUNTRY. AND SOMETHING THAT THEY
IT'S. IT'S ACTUALLY THE ONLY
RENTAL CAR COMPANY THAT IS DOING
IT, UM, WITH REGARDS TO THE
AIRPORTS CURRENTLY HAS SIX
PERMITS AT AIRPORTS. FIVE ARE
COMING ONLINE. THIS THESE
AIRPORTS WILL INCLUDE L A X
ONTARIO. SAN FRANCISCO IS STILL
PENDING NEGOTIATION. AND WE
ABSOLUTELY AGREE THAT WE WANT
PERMITS AT OUR AIRPORTS IN ORDER
TO OPERATE. THE PROBLEM WITH
THIS BILL IS THAT IT CREATES A
PERMIT THAT IS MODELED AFTER THE
RENTAL CAR PERMIT. AND THE
INFRASTRUCTURE THAT TOURO HOST
USES USES AS MUCH DIFFERENT THAN
A RENTAL CAR COMPANY. WE'RE
TALKING ABOUT RENTAL CAR
COMPANIES THAT USE CARWASHES,
GAS STATIONS, SHUTTLES AND SO ON
, SO IT JUST REALLY DOESN'T MAKE
SENSE FOR A TORO HOST OR TORAL
CUSTOMER TO HAVE TO BE OBLIGATED
TO HAVE THE SAME KIND OF PERMIT
OR PAY THE SAME KIND OF FEES. AS
A RENTAL CAR COMPANY. FOR THESE
REASONS, WE CONTINUE TO BE
OPPOSED TO THE BILL. I'LL
MENTION THAT THERE ARE FIVE
OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS BILL,
SOME OF WHICH THAT DON'T DEAL
WITH AIRPORTS ALSO CREATE A
MARKET DISADVANTAGE FOR OUR
HOSTS. MANY OF WHICH I FORGOT TO
EVEN ADD OR OR PEOPLE OF COLOR.
SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS
POTENTIALLY IMPACTING A
COMMUNITY THAT IS JUST TRYING TO
MAKE ENDS MEET AND HELPED OFFSET
THE COST OF THEIR CAR. THANK
YOU. I WILL TURN TO THE PUBLIC.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE
TO SPEAK TO THIS BILL. MICHAEL
ARNOLD, REPRESENTING THE
HOLLYWOOD BURBANK AIRPORT IN
STRONG SUPPORT. MR CHAIR MEMBERS
JONATHAN AARON BELL, JUST
FILLING IN ON BEHALF OF TECHNET
TO REGISTER THEIR OPPOSITION.
THANK YOU. SEEING NO OTHER
PUBLIC COMMENT. AT THIS MOMENT,
I WILL TURN BACK TO THE
COMMITTEE. ARE THERE ANY
QUESTIONS? O BRIEN. WELL, THIS
IS ONE OF THOSE FUN BILLS THAT
HAS A LOT OF NUANCE AND A LOT OF
GOOD THAT'S TRYING TO BE DONE BY
THE AUTHOR. AND SO I APPRECIATE
THAT IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE'S
GONNA BE A LOT OF CONVERSATION
THAT NEEDS TO CONTINUE TO GO ON.
UM I RECOGNIZED THE POINT OF
INDIVIDUAL DRIVERS WHO ARE
LOANING THEIR CARS OUT THROUGH
TOURO PAYING DOWN STUDENT LOANS
SAVING UP FOR THE HOUSING DOWN
PAYMENT. I GUESS MY QUESTION FOR
TOURING THE FACT THAT THAT'S
DIFFERENT THAN COMPANY LIKE
ENTERPRISE. IS THERE A LIMIT ON
HOW MANY CARS A SINGLE HOST
ENTOURAGE CAN PUT ON THE ON THE
SITE. UM I'M NOT AWARE OF A
LIMIT RIGHT NOW. BUT REALLY, IF
YOU'RE I THINK YOU MIGHT BE
GETTING TO THIS POINT OF, UH,
THIS IDEA THAT SOMEHOW SOMETHING
THAT IS LIKE A RENTAL CAR
COMPANY WOULD USE THE EURO AS A
AS A PLATFORM AND I THINK THAT'S
A REALLY GOOD POINT TO RAISE
BECAUSE HERE UNDER CURRENT
EXISTING LAW, AN INDIVIDUAL THAT
PUTS A HOST PUTS A CAR ON A TORO
PLATFORM HAS TO PAY THREE TIMES
INSURANCE. THEY DO NOT HAVE THE
ADVANTAGE OF OPTING NOT TO PAY
THEIR VEHICLE LICENSE FEE WHEN
THEY PURCHASE THEIR VEHICLE. IT
IS ALSO ALMOST INCREDIBLY
DIFFICULT TO GET A SALES TAX
EXEMPTIONS, SO THEY'RE ALSO
PAYING SALES TAX ON THEIR
VEHICLE. WHEN THEY PURCHASED THE
CAR. THEY'RE BUYING THEIR CARS
AT A DEALERSHIP, SO THEY'RE
PAYING A RETAIL VALUE ON THE
CAR. FURTHER THEY DON'T HAVE
VICARIOUS LIABILITY PROTECTIONS
LIKE A RENTAL CAR COMPANY, SO IT
REALLY DOESN'T MAKE A WHOLE LOT
OF SENSE ON THE BUSINESS END TO
OPERATE LIKE A RENTAL CAR
COMPANY UNDER A PEER TO PEER CAR
AND SHARING PLATFORM. I
APPRECIATE THAT. IT'S CALDERON.
THANK YOU, UM. SO I NOTICED THAT
THE BILL HAS RECENTLY BEEN
AMENDED. AND MY QUESTION IS, UM
ARE THESE AMENDMENTS THE RESULT
OF OUR WORK PRODUCT? BETWEEN
CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN THE
OPPOSITION AND THE AUTHOR. SO
YES. AND, UM I JUST WANT YOU TO
KNOW I HAVE MET WITH THE
OPPOSITION NO LESS THAN EIGHT
TIMES. I PERSONALLY WAS ON THE
PHONE WITH GENERAL COUNSEL FOR
THE OPPOSITION TO HELP THEM
DRAFT LANGUAGE. NOW I'M A LAWYER
BY TRADE, BUT THAT'S NOT
NECESSARILY WHAT LEGISLATORS DO.
BUT THAT'S THE KIND OF
ACCOMMODATIONS I HAVE MADE FOR
PURPOSES OF THE BILL. UM AND
CERTAINLY WILLING TO DO DO DO
MORE. I WILL SAY THAT THIS BILL
DOES NOT SEEK TO CONTROL THE
TERMS OF ANY PERMIT BY ANY
AIRPORT, SO IF THERE ARE
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A RENTAL CAR
AND A RIDESHARING APPLICATION
AIRPORTS CAN CERTAINLY TAKE THAT
INTO ACCOUNT. IT HAS BEEN LONG
HELD THAT ON AIRPORT SERVICES
OFF AIRPORT SERVICES ARE VERY
DIFFERENT. WHAT THIS BILL SEEKS
TO DO IS MANDATE A PERMIT
BECAUSE THESE ARE PUBLIC
FACILITIES. WHATEVER THOSE
TERMS, MAYBE. WILL HAVE TO BE
FIGURED OUT BY AN AIRPORT. WE
JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT
PUBLICLY FUNDED FACILITIES THAT
PROVIDE PROFITS FOR COMPANIES.
PAY THEIR FAIR SHARE SO THAT YOU
AND I, JOHN Q TAXPAYER. HAVE TO
PAY LESS FOR THOSE PUBLIC
FACILITIES. EVERYBODY SHOULD
CONTRIBUTE. SO THAT'S THE
SIMPLICITY OF THE BILL. BUT TO
ANSWER YOUR QUESTION ENTERTAINED
, MANY AMENDMENTS WILL CONTINUE
TO DO SO PROVIDED SOME AS LATE
AS FRIDAY AFTERNOON AT FOUR
O'CLOCK. WE HAVEN'T HEARD BACK
YET ON THEM, BUT WE'RE
DEFINITELY CONTINUING TO WORK
AND WILL DO SO. BUT WE MUST
ENSURE THAT AIRPORTS GET PERMITS
FOR THOSE THAT SEEK TO MAKE A
PROFIT OFF THESE PUBLIC
FACILITIES THAT SHALL ALWAYS
REMAIN IN THE BILL. BUT THE
TERMS AND THE DIFFERENCES IN THE
NUANCES BETWEEN A PLATFORM AND A
RENTAL CAR COMPANY CAN ALWAYS BE
REMAINED AND TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT
BY AN AIRPORT. THANK YOU.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S UM, WITH THE
OPPOSITION LIKE TO RESPOND.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. AND THANK YOU
FOR THE QUESTION.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S AND I HAVE TO
APOLOGIZE. WITH ALL DUE RESPECT
. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED
AMENDMENTS DIRECTLY FROM THE
AUTHOR'S OFFICE. UM I WAS SHARED
AMENDMENTS FROM ANOTHER MEMBER.
UM NOT ON THIS COMMITTEE
YESTERDAY. WHICH I THINK ATTEMPT
TO CAPTURE SOME OF THE
AMENDMENTS STOPPED BY THE
SUPPORT BY THE AIRPORT COUNCIL.
UM AND I THINK A PARTIAL ONE
AMENDMENT TO ONE SECTION UM AND
I WILL, YOU KNOW, OH, WE ARE
APPRECIATE THE ASSEMBLY MEMBER
AND THE AUTHORS OFFICE
WILLINGNESS TO WORK WITH US. UM
AND I HATE THAT WE ARE AT THIS
IMPASSE RIGHT NOW, AND THAT
THERE WAS SEEMS TO BE A
BREAKDOWN IN COMMUNICATION, BUT
THAT'S WHERE WE'RE AT. UM EVEN
WITH THE AMENDMENTS THAT WERE
SHARED BY ANOTHER OFFICE LAST
NIGHT, TOURO DOES REMAIN OPPOSED
TO THE BILL. THANK YOU. I THINK
PART OF THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE
EURO HAS MANY LOBBYISTS
REPRESENTING THEM SO EASILY
CONFIRMABLE THAT THERE ARE
EMAILS COMMUNICATING THESE
AMENDMENTS UNDERSTOOD. THANK
YOU. ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S YOU KNOW
IN THIS BILL DOESN'T LEAVE THIS
COMMITTEE AND GOES TO THE
GOVERNOR'S DEATH, SO THERE'S
STILL TIME TO WORK THROUGH IT.
AND I ENCOURAGE THAT YOU WILL
HAVE THOSE OPPORTUNITIES. IT
SOUNDS LIKE THE AUTHOR IS
CERTAINLY PREPARED TO CONTINUE
TO DO THAT. IS THERE ANYONE FROM
THE PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO
HAVE THEIR COMMENTS TO THIS ON
THIS BILL? CNN. IS THERE A
MOTION? THERE YOU GO. BILL IS
OUT, UM, WITH REPUBLICANS, NOT
VOTING, MATHIS AND SANCHEZ GOING
AND I THANK YOU, SIR.
MR HOLDEN, YOU'LL BE PRESENTING
SB 383 FOR PORTANTINO. I AM.
THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR AND
MEMBERS. THIS BILL PROVIDES
APPROPRIATION AUTHORITY FOR
LEGAL SETTLEMENTS APPROVED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE. THE
STATE ENTERED INTO THESE
SETTLEMENTS LAWFULLY. UPON
ADVICE OF COUNSEL. THE
SETTLEMENTS ARE BINDING STATE
OBLIGATIONS. THIS BILL
APPROPRIATES FROM THE GENERAL
FUND. 6.77 MILLION TO THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL AS FOLLOWS. ONE
TIME GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS
OF 3,700,000 IN THE 2022 23/5 OF
A YEAR TO DOJ TO PAY THE
SETTLEMENT ARISING FROM WETLANDS
PRESERVATION FOUNDATION VERSUS
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES.
ONE TIME GENERAL FUND
APPROPRIATION OF 3,073,000. IN
THE 2022 23 FISCAL YEAR TO PAY
THE JUDGMENT ARISING FROM THE
CALIFORNIA DUI LAWYERS
ASSOCIATION VERSUS DEPARTMENT OF
MOTOR VEHICLES. I RESPECTFULLY
ASK FOR YOUR VOTE. AND WITNESSES
AND SUPPORT HEY. ALI AND THE
DEPUTY, A DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL AND THE LEGISLATIVE
DIRECTOR FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE. I'M IN THE INTEREST OF
TIME. I WON'T KEEP MY TALKING
POINTS SHORT. UM THANK YOU.
CHAIR FOR YOU KNOW, HELPING WITH
HIS FELL THIS YEAR AND YOUR
ANNUAL HELP WITH IT, UM, AND FOR
SENATOR PORTANTINO'S AUTHORSHIP
OF THIS IMPORTANT MEASURE, UM
WITHOUT ON BEHALF OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL FREE,
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR
SUPPORT. THANK YOU. DEPARTMENT
OF FINANCE. YES GOOD MORNING.
MICHELLE PAROLE DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE. WE HAVE AN APPROVED
SUPPORT ON THE BILL, AND WE
CONCUR WITH THE COSTS THAT WERE
INDICATED BY ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S
HOLDEN. THANK YOU. ANY MEMBERS
OF THE PUBLIC BACK TO THE
COMMITTEE. HAPPENED IN PELLERIN.
AND THIS IS OUT ON A ROLL CALL.
THANK YOU.
OKAY WE WILL NOW MOVE TO THE
CONSENT CALENDAR. 85 16 RAMOS.
MAYBE 546355 BENNETT. MAYBE 857
ORTEGA. MAYBE 10 38 REYES. MAYBE
10 46 LOWENTHAL EVERY 10 74 ALAN
EASY PRETEND 97 THREE OF US
AVERY 11 40 COMMITTEE ON
INSURANCE. HE WAS 12 10 KARA.
MAYBE 12 39 CALDERON 12 70
DIXON. EVERY 12 85 WEEKS A B 12
87 ALVAREZ EVERY 12 93 IRWIN 80
13 09 REYES. MAYBE 13 20 HOOVER
A B 13 29 MAIENSCHEIN EVERY 14
17 WOULD IT BE 14 47 FLORA?
MAYBE 16 59 SANTIAGO. A B 17 59
COMMITTEE ON ACCOUNTABILITY AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW A B 17 66
COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT AND A CR 38 ALVAREZ.
IS THERE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT
CALENDAR? THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
WE HAVE A MOTION A SECOND HOLD.
NICE DOLLY! SALLY, I, BRIAN.
BRIAN, I CALDERON. CALDERON I.
WENDY KOREA. WENDY KOREA, I
DIXON. DIXON I FONG I HEART
HEART. I LOWENTHAL D¯ÚI MATHIS.
THIS EYE POPPING POPPY AND I,
PELLERIN PELLERIN, I ROBERT
RIVERS. ROBERT RIVAS. I SANCHEZ.
SANCHEZ, I WEBER. ORTEGA. OR
TAKE YOUR EYE. 15 TO 0 THAT
CONSENT CALENDAR IS APPROVED.
NOW TAKE UP THE SUSPENSE FILE.
CLEAR. PLEASE READ THE SUSPENSE
CALENDAR. 80 FIVE'S OVER EVERY
33 BAINES, MAYBE. 46 RAMOS.
MAYBE 51 BOND TO A B 52 GRAYSON.
MAYBE 59 GALLAGHER EVERY 84 WARD
. MAYBE 85 WEATHER MAYBE 99
CONNOLLY 82 41 REYES 82 6 TO
HOLD IN A B 274 BRIAN. MAYBE 3
10 ARAMBULA. MAYBE 3 TO 1 WILSON
. MAYBE 331 BOW BAUER-KAHAN 83
66 PETRIE-NORRIS BEFORE 60 BAUER
QUÊ HONEY BEFORE 71 KARA BEFORE
73 I GO CURRY BEFORE 81 WENDY
CAREER BEFORE 86 CORA BEFORE
NINE TO PILLORY IN. MAYBE 509
VINCE FONG EVERY 5 19 SHIAVO 85
TO 2 KARA. MAYBE 537 BERMAN
MAYBE 543 GIBSON 85 55. ONE
CAREER 85 56 GALLAGHER EVERY 58
TO CONNOLLY 85 96 RACE A B 6 20
CONNOLLY MAYBE 6 TO 5
AGUIAR-CURRY EVERY 6 TO 9
WALLACE, 86 41 VINCE FONG, MAYBE
64 TO 10. IT WAS 643 BERMAN A B
645 FRIEDMAN MAYBE 649 WILSON A.
B 673 BENNETT. MAYBE 679 WEEKS.
A B 7 10 SHIAVO EVERY 716 BURNER
MAYBE 756 POPPIN. MAYBE 814 LOW
AND THOUGHT, MAYBE 8 TO 1
GRAYSON. MAYBE 8 TO 4 CALDERON A
B 841 BERMAN A V 845 ALVAREZ A B
8 70 ARAMBULA. MAYBE 877 AD IS A
B 914 FRIEDMAN MAYBE 9 TO 6 POP
IN 89 35 CONNOLLY MAYBE 963
SHISHKOVA 89 72 MAIENSCHEIN.
MAYBE 979 ALVAREZ 89 91 ALVAREZ
EVERY 10 01 HANEY A B 10 05
ALVAREZ EVERY 10 06 MCKENNA
EVERY 10 08 BAUER-KAHAN MAYBE 10
48 WEEKS A B 10 60 ORTEGA EVERY
10 61 BURNER A B 10 66 JOE
PATTERSON. 10 72 WEEKS, MAYBE 10
78 JACKSON 10 79 JACKSON. MAYBE
10 82 KARA, MAYBE 10 93 JIM
PATTERSON. MAYBE 11 13 MACARI.
IT WOULD 11 22 BAINES. MAYBE 11
28 SANTIAGO A B 11 33 SHIAVO 11
47 ADDED, MAYBE 11 54 WILSON.
MAYBE 11 57 ORTEGA A B 11 68
BENNETT. 11 72 CALDERON A B 11
75 QUIRK-SILVA MAYBE 11 80
RODRIGUEZ A B 11 81 ZUBER. MAYBE
11 88 BURNER A B 11 98 GRAYSON
MAYBE 12 03 BAINES 12 07 IRWIN A
B 12 31 SANTIAGO. MAYBE 12 57
COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONS. MAYBE 12 64
COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONS. MAYBE 12 82 LOW AND
THOUGHT TO BE 12 92 FLORA. MAYBE
13 22 FRIEDMAN. MAYBE 13 37
WEEKS MAYBE 13 58 MURATSUCHI 80
13 73 GARCIA EVERY 13 86 GABRIEL
ÁP 14 15 SANTIAGO. APRIL 14 20
BERMAN APRIL 14 35 LAKI MAYBE 14
48 WHILE I SAY BEFORE 10 51
JACKSON MAYBE 14 63 LOW AND
THOUGHT MAYBE 14 70 QUIRK-SILVA
ÁP 14 78 SAVANTE CB 14 82
GABRIEL EVERY 14 90 LI 14 98
GIBSON MAYBE 14 99 BAUER-KAHAN
EVERY 1500 IRWIN. BABY FOOD 15
04 MCCARTHY EVERY 15 09 COOK
SILVER EVERY 15 12 BRIAN A B 15
13 CALDERON MAYBE 15 18 FRIEDMAN
MAYBE 15 19 BAINES. EVERY 15 22
SAVANT IS MAYBE 15 25 BONTA
MAYBE 15 44 LUCKY. ÁP 15 49
WENDY KOREA EVERY 15 50 BENNETT.
MAYBE 15 68 WOULD MAYBE 15 76
WALLACE CB 15 77 LOW EVERY 15 81
CARILLO EVERY 15 81 KARA, MAYBE
15 84 WEBER. MAYBE 16 04 BANTER.
16 06 GIBSON 80 16 23 MURATSUCHI
. MAYBE 16 26 MCCARTY WAS 16 33
TEEN. A B 16 37 IRWIN A B 16 44
BANTER A B 16 44 45 ZEBRA A B 16
67 IRWIN A B 16 73 PACHECO A B
16 75 FELONIES A B 17 10 TALL A
B 17 11 1 CAREER A B 17 12 IRWIN
A B 17 38, WENDY KOREA A B 17 55
COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY A B 17 65
COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND
TAXATION AND A B 17 69 COMMITTEE
ON GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION.
THANK YOU. THE SUSPENSE CALENDAR
IS DEEMED APPROVED. I WILL NOW
TURN TO OUR GENERAL PUBLIC
COMMENT ON BILLS THAT WERE NOT
HEARD TODAY PRESENTED. WE WOULD
WELCOME THOSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO
PRESENT THEIR POSITIONS ARE
THERE NAME AND ORGANIZATION AND
POSITION ON THE BILL AND WILL
RECEIVE THAT AT THIS TIME.
WELCOME GOOD MORNING, MR
CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS SPEAKER
DESIGNATE. THIS IS IN REGARDS TO
A B 509 FONG ON STUDENT LOAN,
THE TAXATION OF STUDENT LOAN
TUITION ASSISTANCE MY CLIENTS,
SOCIETY OF HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT AND THEIR CALIFORNIA
COUNCIL CAL SHERMAN, THE PROUD
CO SPONSORS OF THAT BILL. MR
CHAIR AND MEMBER SYLVIA'S
RELEASE SHAH HERE ON BEHALF OF
UM, SAN FRANCISCO'S MAYOR,
LONDON BREED CO SPONSOR OF A B 6
45 AND ALSO IN SUPPORT OF A B 6
45 BY ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S FRIEDMAN
. WE HAVE THE SAN FRANCISCO
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, THE SAN
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, THE CITY
OF LOS ANGELES AND THE CITY OF
WEST HOLLYWOOD. AND ON A B 17 38
BY ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S CARILLO THAT
WAS SPONSORED BY MAYOR KAREN
BASS AND STRONG SUPPORT AND WITH
MAYOR LONDON BREED OF THE CITY
AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND
SUPPORT THANK YOU. MR CHAIR AND
MEMBERS, BETSY ARMSTRONG ON
BEHALF OF THE COUNTY HEALTH
EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATION AND
SUPPORT OF THE CHAIRS A B 2 62
AND ALSO ON BEHALF OF CHECK AND
THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION IN
OPPOSITION TO A B 11 68 BENNETT.
THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING, MR
CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS KEIRA ROSS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF GLENDALE,
ONE OF THE PROUD CO SPONSORS A
BABY 6 45 IN STRONG SUPPORT OF
THE BILL. GOOD MORNING TURN
MEMBERS OF AN S. 7000 OF THE
CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
, WHILE CH A DOESN'T HAVE A
POSITION ON A B 15 77 RELATED TO
CLINICAL PLACEMENTS FOR NURSING
STUDENTS. WE DO HAVE SOME
CONCERNS. WITH THE BILL
CURRENTLY IMPRINT. HOWEVER WE DO
APPRECIATE THE AUTHOR AND
SPONSORS WORKING CLOSELY WITH US
ON THEIR PROPOSAL, AND WE LOOK
FORWARD TO CONTINUED
COLLABORATION. THANK YOU. GOOD
MORNING. CRAIG, POLLSTER ON
BEHALF OF EQUALITY, CALIFORNIA
PROUD CO SPONSOR AND STRONG
SUPPORT OF MAYBE FIVE ZABAR AND
MAYBE 16 45 SUPER. IS THIS ONE
LAROCHELLE UTARA ENTRY SMELLS
AND LANG ON BEHALF OF CURRENT
COUNTY. UM, SPEAKING IN
OPPOSITION TO A B 17 05 BY MAKIN
ER SOLID WASTE FACILITIES. THANK
YOU. GOOD MORNING. JOHN SHOVEN,
CALIFORNIA NURSE IS PROUD TO
SPONSOR AND SUPPORT A B 747
MCCARTHY. MAYBE 1001 AND A B
1007. THANK YOU. CHRIS CONNOR ON
BEHALF OF NIGHTINGALE COLLEGE IN
STRONG SUPPORT OF A B 12 92 BY
SALMAN FLORA. THANK YOU. GOOD
MORNING, KAREEN WHITLOW,
REPRESENTING TAKE A STAND
STANISLAS AND OPPOSITION OF A B
659 UNLESS AMENDED. GOOD MORNING
CHAIR AND MEMBERS, DENNIS
QUOTAS. ROMERO ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA HELPED PLUS ADVOCATES
COAST SPONSORS OF ASSEMBLYWOMAN
CARILLO XABI 15 49 SUPPORT.
THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING. I'M
STEPHANIE DEGREE. HERE'S
REPRESENTATIVE FOR CALIFORNIA
NURSES UNITED IN OPPOSITION OF A
B 659 UNLESS SECTIONS THREE AND
FIVE ARE PULLED FROM THE BILL.
THANK YOU. NEVER MIND. THANK
YOU, MR CHAIR MEMBERS ANDREA
BALL ON BEHALF OF THE
PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN AND
YOUTH SPONSOR OF HB 11 13 BY
ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S MCCARTHY IN
SUPPORT. THANK YOU. IS THERE
ANYONE ELSE FROM THE PUBLIC THEY
WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. SEEING
NONE. WE HAVE CONCLUDED OUR
BUSINESS FOR THE DAY THIS
MEETING IS ADJOURNED.