MIKE. GOOD MORNING MEMBERS AND
COMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE AND
THE PUBLIC TO THE ASSEMBLY
COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
AND RETIREMENT. BEFORE WE BEGIN.
I HAVE A FEW ANNOUNCEMENTS TO
MAKE FIRST ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S
BRYANT WILL BE SUBSTITUTING FOR
ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S ATIS DURING THE
HEARING TODAY. HE'LL BE HERE
SOON. SECOND WE HAVE FOUR ITEMS
ON THE AGENDA WITH TWO OF THOSE
BILLS ON CONSENT. THE TWO BILLS
ON CONSENT ARE SP 6 98 WILK, AND
IT SPEAKS 885 SENATE COMMITTEE
ON LABOR, PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND
RETIREMENT. FINALLY WE ARE
LIMITED TO TESTIMONY TO TWO
PRIMARY WITNESSES ON EACH SIDE
OF THE BILL, AND EACH WILL HAVE
THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. WE NEED
TO ESTABLISH QUORUM SECRETARY.
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. HERE TO
PRESENT LUCKY, LUCKY PRESIDENT
BRIAN VINCE FONG. HEANEY PRESENT
. STEPHANIE NGUYEN PRESENT
SHIAVO PRESENT. WELCOME, MR
BRIAN. MEMBERS WE HAVE THE
FOLLOWING ITEMS ON CONSENT.
FIGHT THEM. FILE ITEM THREE. SB
6 98 WILK AND FILE ITEM. FOUR SB
885 SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR,
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT
. IS THERE ANY MEMBER ON THE
COMMITTEE WHO WISHES TO REMOVE
AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT
CALENDAR? HEARING NONE IS THEIR
EMOTION AND SECOND ON THE
CONSENT CALENDAR. ASSEMBLY
MEMBER. GOOGLE OCEAN. BLACKIE
HAS REQUESTED THE FILE ITEM AND
THAT'S WRONG. IT'S SIMPLY MEMBER
LACKEY MOVES AND
ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S BRIAN SECOND
SECRETARY, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL
ON CONSENT CALENDAR. ON ITEM
NUMBER THREE. THE MOTION IS DUE
PAST TWO. CONSENTING ON ITEM
NUMBER FOUR. THE MOTION IS DO
PASS AND WE REFERRED TO THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS WITH
RECOMMENDATION TO CONSENT MAKE
IN ER. HIÆN HER. I LACKEY I
ARTISTS TO ME. BRIAN AND BRIAN
I, VINCE FONG. KENNY. HANEY I
STEPHANIE NGUYEN, STEPHANIE WHEN
I SHIAVO VÚI. HMM. WE'RE GOING
TO PLACE THIS ITEM ON HOLD.
LET'S MOVE ON TO THE FILE ITEM
NUMBER TWO SB 5 10 LAYER. YOU
MAY PROCEED WHEN READY. THANK
YOU VERY MUCH. MADAM CHAIR. GOOD
MORNING. SENATE BILL 5 10
CLARIFIES THAT THE CIVIL SERVICE
EMPLOYEES PROBATION PERIOD
BEGINS. ON THE DATE THAT THE
EMPLOYEE REPORTS TO WORK OR
BEGINS PERFORMING THE DUTIES OF
THE JOB RATHER ON THE DATE THAT
THEY ACCEPT THE OFFER. THERE WAS
A COURT DECISION THAT ISSUED A
NARROW DECISION THAT FOUND THAT
THE APPOINTMENT DATE STARTS.
WHEN THE EMPLOYEE ACCEPTS THE
OFFER. THIS BILL IS A COMMON
SENSE SOLUTION THAT CLARIFIES
THAT SITUATION. IT'S A
REINTRODUCTION OF A BILL LAST
YEAR, SP 6 47 THEN ENCOUNTERED
SOME OPPOSITION AND STOPPED IN
THE ASSEMBLY, AND MY OFFICE HAS
WORKED WITH THE PREVIOUS
OPPOSITION TO SUCCESSFULLY FIND
AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION. THAT'S
THIS BILL. AS A RESULT, THERE'S
NO OPPOSITION. IT PASSED OFF THE
SENATE FLOOR AND 37 TO 0 VOTE.
AND TODAY I HAVE WITH ME FOR
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE. PEOPLE
FROM THE STATE PERSONNEL BOARD
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, AND
AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME, I WOULD
REQUEST AN IPHONE. THANK YOU.
WE'LL START WITH WITNESSES IN
SUPPORT OF THIS BILL AS A
REMINDER TO PRIMARY WITNESS IN
SUPPORT OF THIS BILL WILL HAVE
EACH HAVE THREE MINUTES TO
PROVIDE TESTIMONY. ALL OTHERS
MAY ONLY STATE, THEIR NAME AND
ORGANIZATION. MADAM CHAIR MARIO
GUERRERO ON BEHALF OF THE STATE
PERSONNEL BOARD WITH MY
COLLEAGUE JOSEPH REGUEIRO. WE'RE
ONLY HERE FOR TECHNICAL
QUESTIONS. HAPPY TO ANSWER
ANYTHING YOU MAY HAVE. THANK
YOU. AND SEEING AND HEARING NO
OTHER SUPPORT. UM IS THERE ANY
OTHER SUPPORT IN THE ROOM THAT
WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? HERE IN AN
M. SEEING THAT NO OTHER SUPPORT
. ARE THERE ANY, UM, ON
OPPOSITION THAT WOULD LIKE TO
SPEAK? HERE AND THEN SEE NO
OTHERS IN OPPOSITION. LET'S
BRING IT BACK TO THE COMMITTEE.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OR
COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE
COMMITTEE? CHECK IT.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S HANEY HAS MOVED
THE BILL AND ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S
LACKEY AS SECOND SECRETARY.
PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. THE MOTION
IS DO PASS, AND WE REFERRED TO
THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
. MCKENNA MCKENNA. I LUCKY LUCKY
I BRIAN BRIAN I. VINCE FONG
HANEY. HANEY I STEPHANIE NGUYEN.
STEPHANIE. WHEN I SHIAVO PLACES
. BONE CALLED THE BILL WILL BE
PLACED ON CALL. THANK YOU,
SENATOR VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.
LET'S MOVE ON TO FILE ITEM
NUMBER ONE SENATOR CART EASY.
GOOD MORNING, MADAM CHAIR AND
MEMBERS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR
ALLOWING ME TO PRESENT SP 4 33
TO YOU TODAY S P 4 33 PROVIDES
PARODY CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES IN
SCHOOLS BY GUARANTEEING THAT
THEIR DISCIPLINARY APPEALS ARE
HEARD BY AN UNBIASED THIRD PARTY
HEARING OFFICER. CURRENTLY
TEACHERS ALREADY HAVE THE RIGHT
. TO AN IMPARTIAL THIRD PARTY
HEARING OFFICER. IF A K 12
TEACHER CHOOSES TO APPEAL
DISCIPLINARY DECISION MADE BY
THEIR DISTRICT, IT'S OVERSEEN BY
THE COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONAL
CONFIDENCE. COMMUNITY. COLLEGE
FACULTY ARE ALSO GUARANTEED. A
NEUTRAL UM, PAID FOR BY THE
DISTRICT. CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES,
HOWEVER, ARE NOT GUARANTEED THE
SAME RIGHT UNDER CURRENT LAW IF
A CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE APPEALS OF
DISCIPLINARY DECISION THEY'RE
APPEALING TO THE SCHOOL'S
GOVERNING BOARD. THIS IS THE
VERY BORED INVOLVED IN THE
INITIAL DECISION TO DISCIPLINE
THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE. THIS
SYSTEM IS NOT EQUITABLE, AND IT
DENIES MANY EMPLOYEES. A FAIR
HEARING. AND WALL CLASSIFIED
EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY A UNION
CAN COLLECTIVELY BARGAINED FOR A
THIRD PARTY HEARING OFFICER THE
VAST MAJORITY OF NOT BEEN ABLE
TO DO SO. SP 4 33 PROVIDES
CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES WITH THE
SAME RIGHT AS K 12 TEACHERS,
COMMUNITY, COLLEGE FACULTY AND
MANY OTHER PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. IF
COST FIND EMPLOYEE UNITS PREFER
THE CURRENT SYSTEM. THIS BILL
STILL ALLOWS HIM TO NEGOTIATE
FOR THIS AND COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING AGREEMENTS. BILLS
COAST MONITORED, CO SPONSORED BY
THE CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS
C S A ANNOUNCED ME IT'S
SUPPORTED BY THE CALIFORNIA
LABOR FEDERATION, THE CALIFORNIA
FEDERATION OF TEACHERS WITH US
TO TESTIFY TODAY OR JANICE
O'MALLEY WITHOUT ME AND GLASS.
RAMIREZ FORMER CSE A MEMBER. AND
I WOULD RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR
YOUR I VOTE. THANK YOU AND THE
WITNESSES IN SUPPORT. YOU HAVE
THREE MINUTES TO PROVIDE
TESTIMONY. THANK YOU, MADAM
CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF JANICE
O'MALLEY. UM, THAT HALF OF
ASTHMA CALIFORNIA REPRESENTING
OUR MEMBERS WHO WORK IS
CLASSIFIED STAFF AND THE K 12
SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND IN
COMMUNITY COLLEGES, AND WE'RE
PROUD CO SPONSORS OF SP 4 33. SP
4 33 IS SOLVING FOR THE LACK OF
PARODY AND DUE PROCESS FOR
CLASSIFIED SCHOOL EMPLOYEES. UM
WHICH IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT
TEACHERS AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
FACULTY CURRENTLY RECEIVE. BY
PROVIDING CLASSIFIED SCHOOL
EMPLOYEES WITH THE SAME
DISCIPLINARY APPEAL RIGHTS THAT
TEACHERS AND FACULTY AT THE
COMMUNITY COLLEGES HAVE. DUE
PROCESS PROVIDES PROTECTION
AGAINST ARBITRARY DISMISSAL,
UNFAIR DISCIPLINE AND OTHER
FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION. IT ALSO
HELPS ENSURE EMPLOYEES ARE GIVEN
AN OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO AND
DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST
ACCUSATIONS OR ALLEGATIONS THAT
MAY ARISE IN THE WORKPLACE. THIS
IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT TO
ENSURE THAT ALL EMPLOYERS
PROVIDE EQUITABLE AND RESPECTFUL
TREATMENT TO THEIR EMPLOYEES. UM
CURRENTLY DISCIPLINARY APPEAL
HEARINGS FOR TEACHERS AND
FACULTY OR CONDUCTED BY A
NEUTRAL PANEL PROVIDED THROUGH
THE COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONAL
COMPETENCE, WHEREAS CLASSIFIED
STAFF APPEALS ARE DECIDED BY
SCHOOL DISTRICT OR COMMUNITY
COLLEGE GOVERNING BOARDS. THESE
BOARDS ARE TYPICALLY THE SAME
BODIES THAT VOTE ON INITIAL
DISCIPLINARY DECISIONS. THIS
PROBLEMATIC. MANY OF OUR MEMBERS
FORGO THE APPEAL PROCESS BECAUSE
THEY FEEL THAT THEY WOULD NOT
RECEIVE A FAIR APPEAL SINCE THE
FIRST DECISION. WAS MADE BY THE
SAME BOARD THAT THEY WOULD HAVE
TO APPEAL TO S BEFORE 33 WOULD
STILL ALLOW UNIONS AND DISTRICTS
TO NEGOTIATE ALTERNATIVE APPEAL
HEARINGS AND THEIR COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING AGREEMENTS. WE WANT
TO STRESS THAT THIS BILL DOES
NOT APPLY TO CASES INVOLVING
EGREGIOUS CONDUCT. ARBITRATION
IS VERY RARE, BUT WE DO BELIEVE
THAT CLASSIFIED STAFF DESERVE
THE SAME ABILITY TO HAVE A FAIR
APPEAL HEARING CONDUCTED BY A
NEUTRAL ARBITRATOR, AS TEACHERS
AND FACULTY CURRENTLY DO. WE
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR I VOTE AND
MY COLLEAGUE NOTHING PER YEAR
FROM CSC A IS AVAILABLE TO
ANSWER ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS
YOU MAY HAVE. GOOD? YES. GOOD
MORNING, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS
OF THE COMMITTEE. THANK YOU FOR
THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT. MY
NAME IS GLADYS RAMIREZ. AND I'M
A PROUD FORMER MEMBER OF THE A.
I WORKED AS AN ADMINISTRATIVE
ASSISTANT ADVISOR UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT FOR 24 YEARS. I LOVED
MY JOB BECAUSE I WAS ABLE TO
GROW, LEARN AND OBTAIN THE
SKILLS I NEEDED TO DO MY JOB FOR
OUR KIDS IN THE CITY OF VISALIA.
CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES ARE
ESSENTIAL AND THE BACKBONE OF
OUR T K THROUGH 12TH GRADE IN
OUR SCHOOLS AND ALSO OUR
COMMUNITY COLLEGES. WINTER
SCHOOLS ARE CLEAN. CHILDREN ARE
FED AND GET TO SCHOOL SAFELY. WE
DO THE WORK THAT MOST TAKE FOR
GRANTED. HOWEVER EVEN THOUGH WE
DO THIS ESSENTIAL WORK, WE ARE
OFTEN DENIED BASIC DISCIPLINARY
APPEAL RIGHTS THAT ARE GRANTED
TO TEACHERS. TODAY I'D LIKE TO
SHARE MY STORY. I WAS ACTIVE IN
MY UNION AS CHAPTER PRESIDENT IN
JANUARY, 2018. I SPOKE AT A
BOARD MEETING AND RAISED
CONCERNS AND ISSUES REGARDING
THE CLIMATE SURVEY WE HAD
CONDUCTED IN OUR CHAPTER.
SHORTLY AFTER I WAS PLACED ON
PAID ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
PENDING AN INVESTIGATION
EVENTUALLY SERVED WITH
TERMINATION CHARGES REQUESTED A
HEARING WHERE THE HEARING
OFFICER, AN ATTORNEY HIRED BY
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, NOT
SURPRISINGLY SIDED WITH THE
DISTRICT MANAGEMENT. I WAS
OFFICIALLY TERMINATED BY THE
SCHOOL BOARD ON APRIL 7TH 2019.
ON OCTOBER 7TH 2019 MY UNIONS?
YES A FILED AN UNFAIR PRACTICE
CHARGE WITH THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
RELATIONS BOARD PERP AGAINST BY
SCIENCE WIDE FOR TERMINATING ME
IN RETALIATION. ON JANUARY, 20TH
AND FEBRUARY THE THIRD OF 2021,
THERE WAS A VIRTUAL FORMAL
HEARING IN WHICH PERMITS ISSUED
A PROPOSED DECISION ON JUNE 20/8
2021. PROFOUND THAT BY SIGNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT VIOLATED THE
EDUCATIONAL EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS
ACT BY TERMINATING ME IN
RETALIATION FOR MY PROTECTED
ACTIVITIES. THIS PROCESS HAS
TAKEN 5.5 YEARS AND IN MY CASE
IS CURRENTLY PENDING IN THE
FIFTH APPELLATE COURT. ALL OF
THIS COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED
IF I HAD BEEN ALLOWED TO PEEL MY
TERMINATION TO A NEUTRAL
ARBITRATOR INSTEAD OF THE SCHOOL
BOARD. IT WOULD HAVE SAVED THE
DISTRICT TIME AND MONEY. SB 4 33
WOULD REQUIRE DISCIPLINARY
APPEAL HEARINGS FOR CLASSIFIED
SCHOOL EMPLOYEES TO BE CONDUCTED
BY NEUTRAL ARBITRATOR INSTEAD OF
THE SCHOOL BOARD. THIS BILL WILL
ALSO PROVIDE CLASSIFIED
EMPLOYEES WITH THE SAME
DISCIPLINARY APPEAL RIGHTS THAT
TEACHERS AND OTHER PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES RECEIVE. I
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR EYE
BOAT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ARE
THERE ANY OTHERS REMAINING IN
SUPPORT? PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME
AND YOUR ORGANIZATION. THANK YOU
, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS AND
STAFF STEIGER WITH CALIFORNIA
LABOR FEDERATION, ALSO IN SPORT.
GOOD MORNING, MADAM CHAIR
MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE NEVER
ANY PER YEAR ON BEHALF OF THE
CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES
ASSOCIATION. WE'RE PROUD CO
SPONSORS OF THIS BILL AND
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOUR VOTE.
THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING, MADAM
CHAIR AND MEMBERS ALYSSA YAM ON
BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEES UNION IN
SUPPORT. THANK YOU. GOOD MORNING
, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS.
TRISTAN BROWN WAS CFT UNION OF
EDUCATORS AND CLASSIFIED
PROFESSIONALS HERE IN SUPPORT.
THANK YOU. HEARING AND SEEING NO
OTHERS IN SUPPORT. ARE THERE ANY
WITNESSES AND OPPOSITION PLEASE
COME FORWARD.
YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES. THANK
YOU. GOOD MORNING, MADAM CHAIR
AND MEMBERS CHRIS REEF ON BEHALF
OF THE CALIFORNIA SCHOOL BOARDS
ASSOCIATION. UM REALLY WANT TO
THANK THE SENATOR. AND, OF
COURSE, THE SPONSORS FOR TRYING
TO WORK WITH US ON THE MEASURE.
WANNA ALSO THANK THE COMMITTEE
AND COMMITTEE STAFF AS WELL FOR
TAKING THE TIME. FUNDAMENTALLY
AND IT'S AT THIS ISSUE IS THAT
THIS ACTUALLY UNDERMINES THE
PRINCIPLES OF LOCAL CONTROL.
RIGHT SCHOOL BOARDS HAVE THE
STATUTORY RESPONSIBILITY. THE
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE
PERSONAL DECISIONS FOR ITS
EMPLOYEES. AND WHEN A WHEN A
CLASSIFIED STAFF PERSON APPEALS
TO A SCHOOL BOARD. PREDOMINANTLY
MANY OF THESE CASES ALREADY HAVE
THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO TO A THIRD
PARTY HEARING OFFICER OR
MEDIATOR, MANY OF THEM DO. MANY
OF OUR SCHOOL BOARDS DON'T
ACTUALLY LIKE TO DO THESE TYPES
OF HEARINGS, NOT BECAUSE OF A
DESIRE NOT TO, BUT BECAUSE OF
THE WORKLOAD THAT COMES WITH IT,
THEIR LENGTHY THEY ARE BASED IN
LEGALITIES. SOMETIMES THERE'S
OFTEN ATTORNEYS INVOLVED. AND SO
WHAT HAPPENS IS THAT THE
BARGAINING UNIT AND THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT WAR AGREED TO A THIRD
PARTY HEARING OFFICER PROCESS
THAT WILL GO TO THE HEARING
OFFICER PROCESSED THE HEARING
OFFICER WE RECOMMEND TO THE
BOARD BASED ON THOSE LEGALITIES
, WHETHER OR NOT TO DISMISS OR,
UM REJECT THE RECOMMENDATION OR
THE DECISION TO DISMISS OR
SUSPEND OR SUSPEND WITHOUT PAY
IF YOU WILL, OR DEMOTE THE
EMPLOYEE ULTIMATELY, THIS IS
RESPONSIBLE SCHOOL BOARD. OUR
SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS ARE DULY
ELECTED BY THEIR COMMUNITIES TO
REPRESENT THEIR COMMUNITIES AND
THEIR EMPLOYEES. AND AS A RESULT
, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT HAS
BEEN EMBEDDED IN. YOU KNOW THE
MERITS AND THE PRINCIPLES OF
LOCAL CONTROL. THOSE ARE
PREDOMINANT REASON FOR OUR
OPPOSITION. UM SECONDARILY IS
THE COST OF SOC WHERE THIS
MEASURE IF THIS IS PUT TO A
REQUIRED THIRD PARTY HEARING
OFFICER EVERY TIME THIS WILL
ACTUALLY ELONGATE AND PROLONG
THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE
APPEALS. SOME OF THESE APPEALS
CAN COST UPWARDS OF TENS, IF NOT
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
. UM AND MANY OF THEM, UM, CAN
GO ON FOR MONTHS AT AT TIMES.
AND SO THESE ARE COSTS THAT ARE
GOING TO BE BORN BY DISTRICTS
AND WE'RE ENTERING A TIME PERIOD
WHERE WE'RE ENTERING A DEFICIT
BUDGET. THESE ARE COSTS THAT
WILL BE AN UNFUNDED MANDATE FOR
DISTRICTS AND THEY WILL HAVE TO
DECIDE WHETHER OR NOT TO COVER
THESE COSTS BY TAKING MONEY FROM
THE CLASSROOM TO BE ABLE TO
ADDRESS SOME OF THESE ISSUES. UM
AND SO. ADDITIONALLY THERE IS
ALSO A LACK OF AVAILABILITY OF A
LOT OF THIRD PARTY HEARING
OFFICERS IN SOME AREAS. THINK OF
RURAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND
DISTRICTS IN MOUNTAINOUS AREAS,
AND THEN IT'S ALSO PLACES THE
FULL COST OF THE HEARING OFFICER
ON THE DISTRICT. TYPICALLY RIGHT
NOW MANY DISTRICTS WILL ACTUALLY
NEGOTIATE. WITH THEIR LABOR
PARTNERS TO SHARE THE COST OF
THE THIRD PARTY HEARING OFFICER
SO IT SHARED 50 50 GENERALLY
SPEAKING, THIS THEN PLACES THE
FULL COST OF THAT THIRD PARTY
HEARING OFFICER ON THE DISTRICT
AND SO THAT ONLY INCREASES THOSE
COSTS. SO FOR THOSE REASONS WE
ARE OPPOSED. THANK YOU. ARE
THERE ANY OTHER REMAINING IN
OPPOSITION, PLEASE? STATE YOUR
NAME ORGANIZATION IN YOUR
POSITION. I APOLOGIZE. I WAS
ALSO HAVE LORI TO STATE THE
OPPOSITION OF THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY OFFICES AND PRETEND SUPER
TENSE OFFICE AS WELL AS THE
ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA SCHOOL
ADMINISTRATORS. THANK YOU. GOOD
MORNING, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS
MICHELLE GILL FROM CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BUSINESS
OFFICIALS AND ON BEHALF OF OUR
COLLEAGUES AT ASSOCIATION OF
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY, COLLEGE
DEMONSTRATORS AND OPPOSITION.
THANK YOU. HEARING AND SEEING,
UM NO MORE OPPOSITION. BRING IT
BACK TO THE MEMBERS. IS ANYONE
ON THE COMMITTEE HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? NO. WOULD
YOU LIKE TO CLOSE SENATOR? THANK
YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM CHAIR
RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR I VOTE.
MOVED BY ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S WHEN
SECONDED BY ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S
BRIAN, PLEASE CALL THE ROLL. THE
MOTION IS DO PASS AND WE
REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON
HIGHER EDUCATION WE CAN MAKE IN
HER EYE. LUCKY LUCKY YOU'RE NOT
VOTING. BRIAN. BRIAN I VINCE
FANG, VINCE FONG. NO, HANEY. ANY
I STEPHANIE NGUYEN. STEPHANIE
WENT BROUGH. PLACE THIS BOOK ON
CALL. BUT ON CALL. THANK YOU,
SENATOR. THANK YOU AGAIN. SHE
SENT YOU RIGHT BACK. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. ASSEMBLYMEMBER'S
BRIAN. YES. YES. I'M SORRY. I'M
SORRY, MR BRYANT. I'M SORRY GUYS
DO IT ONLY CYCLE. I'VE SEEN. MR
FRANKLIN. I THINK I JUST GOT
BACK. SO WHATEVER. WILL TAKE UP
THE MEASURES THAT ARE ON CALL.
ITEM NUMBER TWO A B EXCUSE ME SP
5 10. THE CURRENT VOTE IS 50
VINCE FONG. MONNING. AYE. PLACE
THAT BILL BACK ON THE CALL.
PLACE IT BACK ON CALL. THANK
YOU. ITEM NUMBER THREE AND ITEM
NUMBER FOUR. THE CURRENT VOTE IS
SIX YEAR OLD VINCE FONG FONG I
THOSE TWO BILLS ARE OUT. SO
WE'RE JUST WAITING FOR.
FROM HERE. TAKE UP THE MEASURES
ON CALL, PLEASE. ITEM NUMBER ONE
SB 4 33 THE CURRENT VOTERS. 4 TO
1, SZABO. VÚI THAT BILL IS OUT 5
TO 1. ITEM NUMBER TWO SB 5 10,
THE CURRENT VOTERS, 60 SHIAVO.
VÚI THAT BUILDS OUT 7 TO 0.
MEETING IS ADJOURNED.